Decision Maker: Executive Member - The Mayor
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: Yes
The report presented and sought approval of the proposed
revisions to the Council’s Records Management Policy and Retention Schedule
following their schedules’ triennial review, in order to ensure the Council’s
continued compliance with the statutory Code of Practice on the management of
records which sat within the Council’s Information Governance Policy Framework.
Framework.
The Mayor considered a report regarding the Records Management Policy.
The report presented and sought approval of the proposed revisions
to the Council’s Records Management Policy and Retention Schedule following
their schedules’ triennial review, in order to ensure the Council’s continued
compliance with the statutory Code of Practice on the management of records
which sat within the Council’s Information Governance Policy Framework.
The report provided the rules and guidance necessary to appropriately safeguard the Council’s corporate information to ensure it was secure, complete, managed effectively and appropriately accessible.
The decision
required Single Member Executive approval as it was a ‘minor variation to an
existing policy or procedure’, as per Section 6.38.2(a) of the constitution.
The increasing reliance on electronic records, with more information being created and received digitally, had added a new dimension to the challenges that Middlesborough Council faced. The growth of digital technology had provided different ways for the Council to communicate and share information, which made information and records management even more complex.
The Council was in the process of implementing a new corporate storage platform which would ensure structure, consistency and security for its records. Its policy and retention schedules would determine how the Council’s information was structured, and how long information was held for in line with retention legislation.
The policy would underpin and ensure that:
Furthermore, effective records management would also help the Council mitigate the following risks:
The policy and schedule
were reviewed every three years unless there were changes to legislation in the
intervening period that would require an earlier review.
OPTIONS
The Council could choose not to adopt corporate policies on records management, however statutory duties would remain in place and in the absence of a standard approach there would be an increased risk of making decisions that failed to meet those legal duties. Given these duties were in place, this option was not recommended.
ORDERED that the
Records Management Policy and Corporate Retention Schedule Refresh be approved.
REASONS
Consideration of
policy was required to ensure compliance with the Council’s statutory
responsibilities, which would ensure the right information would be available
to the right users, at any time, accessible and used ethically to support
achievement of the Council Plan Ambitions.
Managing Records
effectively would support delivery of the Council’s emerging Digital Strategy.
Report author: Leanne Hamer
Publication date: 17/07/2025
Date of decision: 17/07/2025
Decided at meeting: 17/07/2025 - Executive Member - The Mayor
Effective from: 26/07/2025
Current call-in Count: 0
Accompanying Documents: