25 Review of Licensing fees for Houses in Multiple Occupation
PDF 588 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
ORDERED That Executive approve:
1.
The fee structure set out in paragraph
4.10 of the report and in Appendix 1, and
2.
The review of the HMO licensing process.
Minutes:
The Deputy Mayor submitted a report, on the Mayor’s behalf, for Executive’s consideration. The purpose of the report was to seek Executive approval for the Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) fee structure and reviewed licensing process.
Since 2006, Middlesbrough Council had delivered a statutory
(mandatory) licensing scheme for HMOs occupied by five or more unrelated people
who shared amenities such as a bathroom, kitchen or living space. This was a
duty under Part 2 of the Housing Act 2004. Owners of HMOs were required to
submit a licence application and pay a fee. Environmental Health Officers then
carried out an inspection of the property to check conditions met safety
standards and good management arrangements were in place. Once granted a
licence was usually issued for a five-year period. Currently, HMOs were only
re-inspected during the five-year period if complaints were made by tenants or
others regarding standards or management issues and regulatory action may be
necessary. On an annual basis gas safety
and electrical safety certificates were required to be submitted to the local
authority by the property owners.
HMOs provided more affordable single or double person
accommodation and, due to Middlesbrough’s demographic, there was a considerable
demand for this type of accommodation, particularly from the most vulnerable
tenants. HMO accommodation was often used for emergency accommodation for the
homeless. The number of HMOs had increased in recent years, providing more
accommodation for a growing student market as well as meeting the need for
low-cost single-person accommodation.
There were currently around 1,730 people living in around
245 licensed HMOs in Middlesbrough, the majority of these offered a compliant
standard of accommodation. There were HMO properties that operated illegally
without a licence. These only become known to officers when tenants made
complaints or intelligence was shared between regulatory bodies, including
review of Council tax records and information sharing with other agencies, such
as the Fire Brigade. It was difficult to quantify the extent of unlicensed
HMOs.
Local Authorities set their own fees to recover the costs of administrating and enforcing mandatory HMO licensing. The current fee structure (2024/2025) was £755.42 for HMOs with 5 bedrooms plus a further £24.98 for each additional bedroom. This fee was for a five-year licence.
ORDERED That Executive approve:
1.
The fee structure set out in paragraph
4.10 of the report and in Appendix 1, and
2.
The review of the HMO licensing process.
OPTIONS
The implementation of a new fee and fee structure would
enable the Council to deliver its regulatory requirements and deliver a neutral
budget cost-effective licensing scheme. It would also help to deliver the
Council’s aspiration of providing high quality, affordable housing for all.
The option to ‘Do Nothing’: this would have resulted in the Council continuing to charge the current fees and applying a single fee scheme which would be contrary to recent legal determination. The HMO licensing scheme would have to operate within the current income received from application fees, with the current staffing resource which would restrict the delivery ... view the full minutes text for item 25