Issue - meetings

ORDERED that Executive:

1.    Approves the utilisation of £3.6m of retained Affordable Housing Section 106 developer contributions to replace the Towns Fund grant and bring the available resources back to the previously approved £6.141m;

2.    Approves a revised menu of options to secure properties to alleviate the need for expensive temporary accommodation that would enable greater impact, flexibility and value for money than those previously proposed; and,

3.    Delegates decisions relating to the appointment of the providers from within the menu of options to the Chief Officer with responsibility for Regeneration in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer, and the Executive Member with responsibility for Development.

AGREED that Executive:

1.    Notes the decision of Executive, in December 2024, to invest resources from the Towns Fund grant (£4m) and Levelling Up Partnership grant (£2.141m) to secure properties to alleviate the need for expensive temporary accommodation solutions.

2.    Notes the subsequent decision of Executive, on 12 November 2025, within the Middlehaven Housing report to utilise £3.6m of the aforementioned Towns Fund grant for the appointment of Capital and Centric as the Council’s development partner.

The Executive Member for Development submitted a report for Executive consideration. The purpose of the report sought Executive approval to utilise grant funding and Section 106 resources to secure properties to alleviate the need for expensive temporary accommodation solutions via a range of options.

In December 2024 the Council’s Executive approved a report allocating £6.141m of external grant from the Government’s Town’s Fund and Levelling Up programmes for the provision of housing to reduce the number of people in temporary accommodation. The method of delivery outlined in the report was that the Council would directly purchase and hold the properties.

The principle behind the report was that by increasing the number of properties under the Council’s control, a greater number of people at risk of homelessness could be accommodated at reasonable cost. The benefits of the approach would be an increase in the options available to people at risk of homelessness, and a corresponding reduction in the Council’s expenditure on short term, external housing solutions.

Since the report was prepared, several other delivery options had been identified that would allow the Council to spread the risk inherent in the purchase of significant numbers of properties. This would also utilise the expertise of partners to potentially generate a greater impact for the same level of investment. Utilising a mix of different delivery methods would also allow the Council the flexibility to respond to the changing housing market, and the trends emerging in the data that reflected service user’s needs.

Although the rationale, principles and business case remained current from the December 2024 report, the menu of options that were proposed was much wider than the original direct purchase option. The additional methods proposed for consideration, alongside direct purchase, were detailed in the report and were Partnership with The Ethical Housing Company; Partnership with a Social Investment Fund; and Third-party partnerships/ contracts.

It was intended that the detailed methods were all explored and utilised accordingly, where they balanced the best value for the Council’s investment, with the appropriate spread of risk. The number of properties secured should either equal or exceed the 60 properties identified in the original report.

The detailed options, and therefore the recommendations of the report, related specifically to the use of capital expenditure to secure properties. Any contracting required with specific service providers relating to the support for tenants would still be required to go through the appropriate Council governance and other legal processes.

A Member queried, in relation to paragraph 4.10 of the report, if accommodation would be available to those already homeless as well as those at risk of homelessness. It was confirmed this was the case and that those in temporary accommodation would be charged rent via housing benefit.

It was also commented that veterans would also be eligible for temporary accommodation and that veteran’s eligibility was now higher as part of the common allocation policy.

The Mayor commented that, in relation to paragraph 4.10 (b) the return to the Council’s investment could be ringfenced  ...  view the full minutes text for item 91