Venue: Council Chamber
Contact: Scott Bonner/Susan Lightwing
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Interest To receive
any declarations of interest. Minutes: There were
no declarations of interest received at this point in the meeting. |
|
Transformation of Middlesbrough Council PDF 1 MB Minutes: A
joint report of the Mayor and the Executive Member for Finance and Governance
was presented to set out the proposed direction, aspirations, investment, and
funding requirements in relation to the Council’s Recover, Reset, Deliver
Transformation Programme. The Mayor provided a rationale for the report before referring
Members to page three and advising of a proposed amendment to recommendation
C. It was suggested that the
recommendation be reworded slightly to avoid specific Executive Member
portfolios being attached to it. The
revised recommendation would read as follows: c)
Delegates authority to the Chief Executive in consultation
with the Elected Mayor, Director of Finance and the
Executive Member with responsibility for finance, to apply Transformation
Programme contingency of £1.717m and remaining Redundancy Budget of £2.900m for
the purposes set out in this report. Following Members’
consideration of the report, one single vote in respect of revised
recommendation C, together with recommendations A, B and D as stated in the
report, would be undertaken. The Executive
Member for Finance and Governance provided details regarding Capital Receipts;
the following points were highlighted: ·
Page three, paragraph 1B set out the financial
decision taken by Members on 27 March 2024 (referred to as Phase One), and the
decision to be taken at this meeting, i.e., a request for additional funding
(Phase Two). The total funding for the
Transformation Programme was £13.700m; £4.827m for Phase One, and £8.873m for
Phase Two, subject to approval at this meeting.
It was possible that further phases may come forward as the programme progressed. ·
As outlined in the report, Local Authorities
were not usually permitted to utilise capital, i.e., one-off monies generated
from assets, land and property sales, to fund their
revenue budgets, which paid for day-to-day operational costs such as staffing
and service delivery. However, the
government had created an exception whereby in certain circumstances, receipts
from the sale of assets could be utilised on a one-off basis to support the
revenue budget. In essence, capital
receipts could be utilised to reduce the costs of services, to increase revenue
income, or to support a more efficient way of operating services. There were restrictions around the
utilisation of capital receipts. For
example: a capital receipt received five years ago could not be utilised in the
current year. ·
The additional funding being requested was
necessary for the following reasons: 1. To
deliver the savings that Council had agreed as part of the revenue budget. It was explained that capital receipts were
required to fund those identified savings, some of which were additional
staffing or other investment costs, and others
redundancies, which Members had agreed at the last meeting. 2. To
fund the Transformation Programme. It
was explained that following feedback from Members about a lack of clarity in
detail, officers had been requested to provide further information to identify
each of the budget saving suggestions and the costs or investment required
against those. This had been provided
and was shown in the annex at page 34 onwards of the report. 3. Unlike ... view the full minutes text for item 23/122 |