Venue: Council Chamber
Contact: Susan Lightwing
No. | Item |
---|---|
Welcome and Evacuation Procedure Minutes: The Chair welcomed all present and read out the Evacuation Procedure. |
|
Declarations of Interest To receive
any declarations of interest. Minutes: There were
no declarations of interest received at this point in the meeting. |
|
Minutes - Corporate Affairs and Audit Committee - 5 August 2021 PDF 166 KB Minutes: The minutes of the Corporate Affairs meeting held on 5 August 2021 were submitted and approved as a correct record. |
|
Payment of Council Tax - Councillors PDF 321 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: A report of the Director of
Finance was presented to outline the Council’s position and approach in regards
to the collection of Council Tax from Councillors and the obligations on
Councillors in relation to meeting payment requests. The report also provided information on
Councillors’ compliance with their legal duties in relation to the payment of
Council Tax. The payment of Council Tax was a
statutory obligation, governed by the Local Government Finance Act 1992.
Payment of Council Tax was due at regular intervals, usually
on a monthly basis. Should non-payment
result in further action, the legislation was clear on the stages that could be
taken to secure payment. Where payment was not made as
indicated on the bill, a reminder notice was issued within 14 days of the
amount becoming overdue. If payment was
still not forthcoming, the account would be selected for a summons and the full
year’s council tax would become payable.
If full payment was not received,
the Council would make a request to the Courts for a Liability Order. If granted, a Liability Order provided
additional powers to recover monies due.
In respect of Councillors, one of these powers was an attachment to the
Councillor’s allowances. If an
attachment was undertaken, a percentage of the Councillor’s allowance could be
deducted on a monthly basis until the amount due was cleared. Middlesbrough Council had 46
Councillors, excluding the elected Mayor, and 87.5% of Councillors paid their
Council Tax by monthly direct debit, with the remainder choosing to pay by
cash on a monthly basis. The legislation which governed
the payment of Council Tax and the obligations of Councillors was contained
within Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 (LGFA 1992). This legislation made it a criminal offence
for any Councillor who had arrears of Council Tax outstanding for two months or
more to attend any meeting at which a decision affecting the Council’s budget
was to be taken, unless the Councillor concerned declared at the outset of the
meeting that they were in arrears and would not be voting on the decision for
that reason. Checks made dated back to 2015,
confirmed that no Councillor had been excluded from voting, albeit a small
number might have fallen behind with payment.
All Councillors’ accounts were up to date and in some instances the full
year’s amount had been paid. Revenues Service provided monthly
checks against each Councillor’s account.
Notification was forwarded to Democratic Services should any Councillor
hit triggers and fall behind with payment by two months or more. It was highlighted that, although
the Service undertook these checks, the responsibility for meeting payment
obligations and raising non-payment issues, rested entirely with the
Councillor, as it also applied to any other resident within the borough. The
Council did not provide any variation in service that would result in
Councillors being treated preferentially over other residents. It was accepted that payment difficulties could arise, and support and payment plans could be put in place for Councillors ... view the full minutes text for item 21/15 |
|
Suspension of Council Procedure Rule No 5 - Order of Business Minutes: ORDERED that, in accordance with Council Procedure Rule No 5, the Committee agreed to vary the order of business. The remaining agenda items would be considered as follows: Agenda Items 8, 9, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 13. |
|
Procurement Overview for 2020/21 PDF 347 KB Minutes: A joint report of the Executive Member for
Environment and Finance and Governance and the Director of Finance was
presented to provide a summary of the Council’s procurement activity over the
last financial year including compliance with Standing Orders, practice changes
and contract awards. The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant
impact on procurement activity during 2020/21 and there had been some
significant challenges, which the procurement team had handled positively with
suppliers to ensure continuity of provision and services. The table at paragraph 4 of the submitted
report showed the thresholds as at 1st April 2020 to 31st March 2021, which all
procurement activity should adhere to.
It was clarified that the thresholds were set by OJEU and Central
Government. Some contracts allowed for a
variance which might go over the threshold if there were sudden increases in
supplies such as fuel but this was closely monitored. One of the consequences of the Covid-19
pandemic had been the extension of 77 contracts, since it was not possible for
formal tenders to be carried out. These
extensions were compliant with the Public Contract Regulations and the relevant
PPN’s and contracts were formally varied. These procurements were being
re-scheduled into future tender pipeline. Throughout the
pandemic the Council had worked to ensure that services continued without
disruption and that suppliers were supported as much possible. There were currently 475 active contracts
recorded on the Council’s Contract Register. In line with Standing Orders there were
occasions where an exemption from Standing Orders could be obtained through a
fully transparent approval process.
During 2020/21 there were 48 exemptions approved, compared to 60 in
2019/20. 2020/21 breaches were minimal due to COVID
restrictions reducing the procurement activity being undertaken by the Council.
However there were recent occasions where standing orders had not be adhered to
and assurance measures were being undertaken now to deal with them. Further training would be beneficial for
staff in order to promote better understanding of the contract procedure rules
and the Procurement Manager had been tasked with developing this work. During 2020/21 the Council spent £7,515,013
via purchasing cards via a total of 25,438 transactions. The majority of spend continued to be low
value with 16,842 (66%) being under £99, 6,621 (26%) were £100 to £499.99 and
1,975 (8%) were over £500. Rebates for
the cards were paid 1 December to 30 November and in December 2020 the Council
received a rebate of £67,345.83. A
further rebate would be received in December 2021. Previous audit recommendations in relation
to purchasing cards had been implemented and this had strengthened monthly
reporting to cardholders and line managers on the reviewing of the purchasing
cards, and cards being cancelled where the Council’s policy was not being
adhered to. It was confirmed that
purchasing cards were allocated to individuals only and that a pin number was
usually required to make a purchase. Following Executive approval, the Council intended to procure the Supplier Incentive Programme (SIP) (also known as an Early Payment System) with Oxygen ... view the full minutes text for item 21/17 |
|
Subject Access Requests - Compliance Update PDF 140 KB Minutes: A report of the Data Protection
Officer was presented to provide an update regarding Middlesbrough Council’s
legal compliance with the right of subject access. The Committee previously received
the Annual Senior Information Risk Owner (SIRO) Report at its meeting on 29
April 2021 which included an update regarding the backlog of subject access
requests (SARs). Since the last update to the
Committee, the temporary post in the Children’s Services department had been
put on a more permanent footing within the Medium Term Financial Plan. The
effect of that role, and the existing post dedicated to historical Children’s
Services SARs, had resulted in a reduction of the backlog of cases received
prior to 2021, to 10 within that department. A small number of those cases
were awaiting ‘life story work’ to be provided by the Children Looked After
Service to ensure that those requestors received the information they had asked
for, but with the right level of pastoral support and explanation about their
time in care. The other requests were taking a significant amount of time
to process due to the nature of those cases and people who had spent a
significant number of years in care. In
one example, there was in excess of 650 files totalling 6,000 pages, all of
which needed to be reviewed and redacted to comply with the data protection
legislation. The requestors in those cases were aware of the reasons for the
delays and were content to receive the information in a number of partial
responses as the work progressed. It was
noted that the Department had recently received thanks from someone who had
been overwhelmed by the amount of information that was provided and the history of what happened to
that person in care, acknowledging the painstaking work undertaken to provide
it. It was noted
that a further 56 SARs had been received by the Children’s Services Department in 2021 to
date, 42 of which had been responded to. In total, the current number of open
SARs in the department was 24, with 17 of those being overdue. The Chair, on behalf of the Committee, thanked the Department for the work undertaken. AGREED that the information provided was received and noted. |
|
Internal Audit and Counter Fraud Progress Report PDF 154 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Head of Internal Audit,
presented a report to update the Committee on the progress of internal audit
and counter fraud work during 2021-2022 and the outcomes from work completed
since the last report. A copy of the internal audit progress report was attached at Appendix 1 to the submitted report. Details of progress against the internal audit work programme and a summary of current work in progress, internal audit priorities for the year, completed work, and follow-up of previously agreed audit actions were included. The Auditor had no specific issues to bring to the Committee’s attention. It was highlighted that target
completion dates for audits were always subject to change. In addition, all P1 and P2 internal audit actions
were part of the corporate performance management system and were regularly
reviewed by the Chief Executive and the Corporate Management Team. The counter fraud progress report was attached at Appendix 2 to the submitted report and detailed a range of work including activity to promote awareness of fraud, work with external agencies, and information on the level of fraud reported to date. AGREED as follows that:
was noted.
|
|
Annual Counter Fraud Framework Report PDF 151 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Head of Internal Audit provided a report to update
Members on the impact of fraud nationally and in particular on local
authorities. The Council’s counter fraud
policy framework had been reviewed and the Counter Fraud Strategy Action Plan,
The Fraud Risk Assessment, and the Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy
had been updated. A copy of the annual
Counter Fraud Framework Report was attached at Appendix 1 to the submitted
report. AGREED that the following documents were received
and noted by the Committee:
|
|
Verbal Update - Statement of Accounts Audit Progress/VAT The Head of Finance and Investment will provide a verbal update. Minutes: Statement of Accounts 2020/2021 The Head of Finance and
Investments provided a verbal update.
The statutory date for approval of the audited statement of accounts for
2020/21 was 30 September 2021.
However, the audit of the accounts was not yet finished and, as a
result, the approval report on the audited accounts and planned training for
Members would be delayed until the work had been completed. The Covid-19 pandemic and the
ongoing impact on local authority finance teams, the overall financial position
of Councils generally, and the work required by external auditors to undertake
the audit had been significant. These
factors had resulted in delays in audit work being undertaken and audits being
signed off nationally. Many audits had
still not started due to delayed audit opinions relating to previous years and
workload for finance teams and audit firms.
Middlesbrough Council’s audit was progressing well and was ahead of many
other authorities in comparative terms. There were some complex
expenditure and funding arrangements to assess as a result of Covid-19, in
respect of uncertainty around material assets and liability values. This work needed additional discussion and
evidencing by auditors. There had also
been staffing issues at both the Council and for local auditors also. Middlesbrough Council had had a vacancy at
Chief Accountant level since early last year. The aim was to complete the audit in the next one to two
months and the audited Statement of Accounts would either be presented to
Members for approval at the Corporate Affairs and Audit Committee meeting
scheduled for 9 December 2021, or at an ad hoc meeting if completed
earlier. As a result of the statutory deadline not being met, a
notice would be placed on the Council’s website with the draft accounts from 30
September 2021, with a note to explain that the audit was ongoing and the
audited accounts were not yet available for publication. It was highlighted that no other Tees Valley local authority
had been able to complete their audit of accounts within the statutory
timeframe. Responding to members’ queries it was clarified that the
main areas of focus were pensions accounting and covid
business grants. It was confirmed that
there were no penalties for late approval of the accounts. The Chair requested that Members received notification of
training as early as possible. Value Added Tax The Council had appointed a new VAT officer who had been in
post since 23 March 2021. In relation to purchasing cards, the auditor had previously
raised an issue of council staff using their purchasing cards but either not reclaiming
any relevant VAT, and/or not retaining receipts and invoices as proof for HMRC. In general there were a number of internal controls that need improving on the use of purchasing cards and most of this was in terms of awareness and compliance with business process that the Council used in this area. This was being led by the Procurement team who had issued updated procedure notes and some direct training to ... view the full minutes text for item 21/21 |
|
Any other urgent items which in the opinion of the Chair, may be considered Minutes: Exempt Reports Following a brief discussion in relation to exempt reports, the Monitoring Officer suggested that it would be appropriate for the Constitution and Members’ Development Committee to give this topic further consideration. NOTED |
|
Exclusion of Press and Public To consider passing a Resolution Pursuant to Section 100A (4) Part 1 of the Local Government Act 1972 excluding the press and public from the meeting during consideration of the following items on the grounds that if present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information falling within paragraphs 1 and 2 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act and the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. Minutes: ORDERED that the press and public be excluded from the meeting for
the following items on the grounds that, if present, there would be disclosure
to them of exempt information as defined in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Part 1 of
Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 and that the public interest in
maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the
information. |
|
Appointment of LA Governors Additional documents:
Minutes: A report of the Executive
Director of Children's Services was presented regarding a vacancy for a Local
Authority appointed School Governor that had arisen as a result of a
resignation. Members were asked to note that
“The Constitution of Governing Bodies of Maintained Schools Statutory
Guidance for Governing Bodies August 2015 states that Local Authority governors
are nominated by the Local Authority but appointed by the Governing Body.” The Local Authority could
nominate any eligible person as a Local Authority Governor, but it was for the
Governing Body to decide whether their nominee had the skills to contribute to
the effective governance and success of the school and met any other
eligibility criteria they had set. Local Authorities should therefore make
every effort to understand the Governing Body’s requirements and identify and
nominate suitable candidates. Members were asked to consider
formally approving the appointment of Governors highlighted in bold in Appendix
1 attached to the submitted report. ORDERED that the following appointments, for a four year term of
office, as agreed by the respective School Governing Bodies, were approved: Berwick Hills Primary –
Councillor A Hellaoui Holmwood School – Councillor D Branson |