Venue: Council Chamber
Contact: Chris Lunn / Georgina Moore
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: There were no declarations of
interest received at this point in the meeting. |
|
Minutes - Executive - 29 April 2022 PDF 362 KB Minutes: The
minutes of the Executive meeting held on 29 April 2022 were submitted and
approved as a correct record. |
|
Minutes - Executive - 10 May 2022 PDF 452 KB Minutes: The
minutes of the Executive meeting held on 10 May 2022 were submitted and
approved as a correct record. |
|
Adoption of Stainsby Country Park and Masterplan PDF 383 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Executive Member for Regeneration and the
Director of Regeneration and Culture submitted a report for the Executive’s
consideration. The purpose of the report was to seek adoption of the Stainsby
Country Park and Masterplan, which had been finalised following public
consultation, and delegate authority to the Director of Regeneration and
Culture, in consultation with the Executive Member for Regeneration, to make
any subsequent minor amendments to the Stainsby Country Park and Masterplan. Adoption of the Stainsby Country Park and
Masterplan planned to protect the best interests of Middlesbrough and would
provide the Council the best possible control over the development of the land
between Acklam and the A19. Adoption was crucial as the first of a number of
planning applications relating to the site had already been submitted and was
currently under consideration. The masterplan set standards for a country park
alongside new community facilities, sports facilities and play areas, as well
as hundreds of new homes. The new housing was necessary to deliver the required
number of homes by 2029. The aim of adopting the masterplan was to give
the Council more sway when considering planning applications. The vision for a
country park would support nature, wildlife, trees and healthy living, and be
key in creating a high quality place to live. Not adopting the masterplan would leave the
Council with limited power to influence how the area was developed, including
the design of any roads. Without a masterplan, private developers would
have more freedom to develop housing and infrastructure - including a road - as
they saw fit. That was because while the land was allocated for housing in the
Council’s Local Plan, adopted in 2014, the Local Plan did not contain
sufficient information to control the level of detail the Council wanted to
achieve. The Local Plan was the main document that would be considered in any
application, the masterplan supplemented the Local Plan and set out how the
Council wanted to see any development delivered. The Executive was not being asked to approve
housing or a road, simply the design standards and principles that developers
would be expected to meet. The masterplan had been amended to make clear
that as much as possible of Mandale Meadow would be retained in its current
condition and incorporated into the wider country park. If the masterplan was
implemented it would lead to a significant increase in high quality and
accessible open space for the community thanks to the country park. A Member commented on the importance of
building eco-friendly homes that were energy efficient. A Member queried the reason for Highways
England making no commitment to the provision of the link road. The Director of
Regeneration and Culture explained that Highways England would not comment
until a full planning application had been submitted and further information
was available to fully assess the impacts upon the highway network. A Member made reference to paragraph 26 of the submitted report and enquired whether funding was available from the Tees Valley ... view the full minutes text for item 22/4 |
|
The decision(s) will come into force after five working days following the day the decision(s) was published unless the decision becomes subject to the call in procedures. |