Venue: Virtual Meeting
Contact: Susan Lightwing
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Interest To receive
any declarations of interest. Minutes: There were
no declarations of interest received at this point in the meeting. |
|
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting of the Economic Development, Environment and Infrastructure Scrutiny Panel held on 24 March 2021 were taken as read and approved as a correct record. |
|
Middlesbrough Regeneration Post Covid-19 Scrutiny Review - Liveable Neighbourhoods - Waltham Forest Council The Programme Manager, Enjoy Waltham Forest, will be in attendance to give a presentation in relation to Waltham Forest Council’s Liveable Neighbourhoods Programme. Recommendation: for Panel to determine whether further information is required. Minutes: Chris Proctor, Programme Manager, Enjoy Waltham Forest, gave a
presentation in relation to Waltham Forest Council’s Mini Holland and Liveable
Neighbourhoods Programmes. Waltham Forest was an outer London Borough in north east London. It was a diverse Borough from land use and
geography, through to demographics.
South of the Borough, towards inner London it was more dense, with a
predominantly Victorian road network. To
the north the Borough was a lot more suburban with less density of properties
and increased green infrastructure. In 2014, Waltham Forest had polluted residential streets, traffic
congestions, lack of cycling facilities and green spaces, a poor walking
environment and few places to sit and enjoy. Waltham Forest Council set out its objectives to address the issues as
follows: • Join up cycle routes
into a network. • Rebalance streets to be
safer for everyone. • Reach 10% of journeys
by bike by 2020. • Create better public
space and environment for everyone. • Make Waltham Forest
better connected for everyone. • Demonstrate best
practice – nationally and internationally if possible, by looking at what had worked on the
continent and how that could be applied. • Attract growth into the
area by enabling growth and regeneration and ensuring
policies were car free and supported with the necessary transport infrastructure. • Support other Council
objectives. The Mayor of London introduced the Mini Holland funding programme in
2014. The programme included the
introduction of cycle superhighways in London and the quiet network. A number of outer London boroughs that were
traditionally car dependent areas, were awarded funding to transform
infrastructure and encourage behaviour change.
Waltham Forest Council was successful in obtaining funding from the Mini
Holland programme, originally for 3 years but eventually for 5 years. The vision for Waltham Forest Council’s Mini Holland included: • Lea Bridge Road – a
street for everyone. • Four Walthamstow
Village schemes. • Four Town Centre
Schemes. • A network of high
quality cycle routes. • Complementary measures. • Secure cycle parking. The north circular road cut the Borough in half and provided quite a
neat boundary to separate the higher and lower density housing. There needed to be an integrated and holistic
set of improvements, rather than just a route or an area based scheme. The scheme tried to invoke a step change in
terms of how people would travel around the Borough. A core grid of high quality cycle routes was implemented on the primary
or main road network and given the nature of traffic they were separated from
vehicles and pedestrians. There were
also some quieter routes, using lower volume residential streets and green
spaces, to build a skeletal network so that people had a real choice. Around the town centre there were some local area based schemes designed to make roads in these areas better for walking and cycling without putting in dedicated infrastructure. So not necessarily having formal segregated cycle lanes, or crossings but looking at traffic reduction measures and making areas more suitable for ... view the full minutes text for item 20/58 |
|
Middlesbrough Regeneration Post Covid-19 Scrutiny Review - Middlehaven Master Plan The Head of Capital Projects, Regeneration and Culture, will be in attendance to provide an overview of the Middlehaven Masterplan. Recommendation: for Panel to determine whether further information is required. Minutes: Following investment from the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) and Middlesbrough Council, clearance work had taken place at Middlehaven to provide a blank canvass for development. There had been several masterplans for the area but none had come to fruition due to several factors including; the global recession, lack of funding, development values and much of the land being in different ownerships. There had been some successes including Middlesbrough College campus, Boho 1 and Boho 5 and My Place. However a large area of Middlehaven was still undeveloped. Circumstances had changed over time but accelerated in a positive direction over the last couple of years. The Council now had control over the area although there was still some land from which the proceeds of any sale had to be shared with the HCA. The Council had been successful in bringing funding into Middlehaven and it was easier to sell to Developers now because it was a blank canvass. Almost £30 million had been secured through the Tees Valley Combined Authority (TVCA) for various projects and the Towns Fund project was focussed on Middlehaven. The Council had also recently secured £7.9 million from the Brownfield Housing Fund to spend on site preparation. Market opportunities had changed with a shift to more urban living as well as a lot more interest in commercial development through the growth of the digital sector and others. As the College had expanded there was more interested in educational opportunities and a new secondary school would be built there. BCEGI, one of the world’s biggest building companies, as well as being a Funder and Developer, had been brought on board to provide expertise that was not available in-house or locally. One of the key issues about developing a masterplan for Middlehaven was that it had to be planned in a coherent way, so that different schemes would not be competing against each other. As different schemes came forward they were all working within their own boundaries and the spaces in between: public realm, transport infrastructure, open space, all needed to be planned properly. It was also vital that new developments were phased properly. Bringing lots of property to the market at once could depress values and dampen some of the enthusiasm for Middlehaven. However, due to various funding streams, the Council did need to bring developments to market at a slightly faster pace than would have been the ideal. The masterplan needed to tell a clear story so that anyone who was thinking about investing in Middlehaven could see what was happening and when. The masterplan would give the area an identity and guide investment decisions as well as helping prioritise project delivery and secure further external funding. It would also assist in convincing investors who were currently interested in MIddlehaven, as well as those who were not currently interested, that there was big development happening and there was potential to deliver it all. The Council wanted to be proactive about the spaces in between developments so ... view the full minutes text for item 20/59 |
|
Overview and Scrutiny Board Update The Chair will provide a verbal update on matters considered at the meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Board held on 8 April 2021. Minutes: The Chair provided a verbal update on items considered at the Overview and Scrutiny Board meeting held on 8 April 2021. |
|
Any other urgent items which in the opinion of the Chair, may be considered Minutes: The Chair thanked Members and Officers for their contributions to the Panel over the last two years. |