The Director of Regeneration will be in attendance to
provide an overview in relation to Middlesbrough Council’s
responsibilities with regard to empty properties as an introduction to the
Panel’s scrutiny review on this topic.
Recommendation: that the Panel determines what further information will be required for this scrutiny investigation.
Minutes:
The Director of Regeneration gave
a presentation in relation to Empty Properties in Middlesbrough.
Middlesbrough currently had
approximately 2000 empty homes some of which were causing issues. Properties that had been empty for longer
than six months diminished local housing needs and could have a severe impact
on neighbourhoods. These homes could
attract anti-social behaviour, increased crime rates and decrease local
property values and outside investment opportunities.
Substantial areas of the town had
high residential voids, low sale values and high population churn, which
created potential market failure - resulting in social consequences and
implications for Council resources and service delivery. This situation was unsustainable and
resulted in the need for significant market intervention at great cost to the
Council. Tackling empty homes in
Middlesbrough and bringing them back into use would positively impact on
residents, including the homeless, children leaving care, and families in need
of accommodation, or temporary accommodation, as well as the wider community,
for whom empty properties often caused problems.
Middlesbrough Council had implemented the following actions
to date:
·
Empty Homes Strategy
The strategy, which was subject
to review, was designed to target and address empty homes in
Middlesbrough. It was being considered
alongside homeless and temporary accommodation needs.
·
Problem Property Action Plan
The
aim of the plan was to better unify and co-ordinate Middlesbrough Council’s
cross-directorate and partner agency problem property interventions, bridge gaps and embed the actions and
assess and address the issues
across Middlesbrough’s problem properties, streets and gardens aligning with the new Empty Homes Strategy.
·
Questionnaire
The aim was to ascertain why
properties were empty and sign post to
other services or inform residents of available funding options and/or
assist with repair work to bring them back into use. The Council could also draw down on cross
directorate enforcement powers and track premiums. The results of the questionnaire would be
evaluated.
·
Pilot - North Ormesby
All streets had been reviewed and
problem properties that were detrimental to the area had been identified – all
of which were empty. Properties had been
flagged and reported through the AIM meeting.
Information held on the council tax database was also checked for
accuracy.
·
Introduced Completion Notices – April 2024
Forced owners to undertake the
work to bring their property into the rating list.
·
Cross Directorate Approach
-
Consultation process with stakeholders and
partners took place monthly.
-
A communications Management Matrix.
-
Terms of Reference created.
-
Work Packages within the problem properties
action plan had been agreed.
-
Task and Finish Group established.
-
Regular meetings.
-
Bi-monthly Highlight Reporting on progress.
-
Empty and problem premises intervention process
and powers agreed.
-
Presented to the Mayor and Executive Members and
the Policy Development Group.
Priorities for the Council included:
·
Working with Housing providers to bring back
their empty properties back into use for the purpose of using them to
accommodate temporary households, homeless or children leaving care.
·
Purchasing empty properties and refurbishing them
to an acceptable standard to increase housing stock.
·
A Pilot scheme to identify:
Top 10 Long term empties - survey
issued: findings to be evaluated.
Top 10 properties considered to
be most in need of refurbishment: identify actions to bring them back into use.
Top 10 properties with highest
arrears for Council Tax and Business rates: potential forced sale.
·
Review of the Empty Property Strategy to align
to homeless and temporary accommodation needs by October 2024.
Details of the Council’s empty
and problem premises intervention process and powers were provided. The Council was keen to work develop positive
relationship with owners and housing providers to improve their properties and
uplift areas.
A summary of the number of empty
properties in August 2024, broken down by Ward area was also provided. There were 2231 empty properties with 1233
empty for more than 6 months. Not all
properties were derelict or deserted.
There was an outstanding council tax balance of £5.5 million. The areas with the highest number of empty
properties were the Central and Newport Wards, where the
majority of stock were in Council Tax Band A.
Council Tax regulations enabled
for a premium to be charged on properties that had been empty for two years or
more. Nationally, the number of
properties being charged the empty homes premium had risen year on year,
suggesting that properties were remaining empty for longer, despite significant
financial charges being placed against a property by the Local Authority.
Middlesbrough Council did not
currently charge the maximum premium for properties that had been empty for 10
years or more. Whilst there were some
advantages to charging the premium there were also disadvantages. It could be argued that charging the premium
could become counter-productive since it increased the Council’s debt
provision. It was considered that
exercising cross directorate powers as well as engagement with Landlords
created more positive outcomes. The
Council was also expanding its work with Registered Social Landlords to ensure
they brought their properties back into use as soon as possible.
Previously there had been a
Private Sector Housing Team within the Council and over the next few months
Strategic Housing would become a function again. The Regeneration Directorate currently only
worked on new buildings and new sites.
Some of the powers that had previously existed were now scattered across
different parts of the Council and were not all actively used. A Member asked whether the Council had the
power to force the sale of a property.
It was confirmed that the Council could carry out compulsory purchase
however to do this could take many years and also cost
a lot of money. The cheaper and easier
solution was to get the owners to rectify issues with their properties.
When a property had been secured
or boarded up by the Council, a Member asked what further action was
taken. The Director explained that this
was the long-term strategy – to build a relationship with the owner and work
with them to improve the area. Once an
area started to improve it was hope that further intervention would not be
needed. Existing Council resources were
limited and the current team concentrated on the properties that were in the
worst state of repair. Surprisingly it
was often the case that people did not even know they owned a property – they
might not even live in the UK and could have been left it in a Will. So those properties were not being checked
regularly and were often those causing the most problems.
The Council was working with
housing associations, using money including government funding to buy,
refurbish and manage empty homes which could be used for vulnerable people,
saving money on temporary accommodation.
Funding was in place for one housing provider to tackle 200 properties
over the next two years.
AGREED as follows that:
Supporting documents: