Minutes:
The Head of Virtual School delivered a presentation
to the Board, which focused on ‘Unvalidated End of Key Stage Outcomes for
Looked After Children 2024’.
The Board heard that, prior to entering care, many
CLA had had a disrupted education, which included poor attendance; multiple
school moves; and multiple suspensions or exclusions. Many had also suffered trauma and had
attachment disruptions which impacted upon neurological development. Such disruption affected their ability to
focus in lessons, and this could continue until they
felt safe and secure. Support staff
wanted children and young people to feel safe and secure in the school
environment, and this did provide challenge.
CLA may also have experienced many changes whilst
in care, which included home moves; school moves; and changes of social
worker. All of these affected their
ability to make good progress at school.
Regarding the virtual school interim outcomes for
2024, the Board was advised that the information being reported on referred to
the attainment for all CLA alongside the ‘qualifying cohort’, which was
children who had been in care for 12 months or more as at
31 March 2023. It was explained that
there had been a return to pre-pandemic grading in England this summer as exams
and assessments for all qualifications had progressed as planned. The Department for Education (DfE) had
confirmed it was not necessary for students to memorise formulae for GCSE
Mathematics and equations for GCSE Physics and Combined Science in 2024. The Board noted that this was the final year
that formulae would be provided, and from next year onwards, students would be
expected to recite them.
A table illustrating statistical data in respect of
CLA attainment at Early Years and Key Stage 2 was provided, as follows:
|
All CLA National 2024 % |
All CLA Regional 2024 % |
CLA Statistical Neighbours 2024 % |
CLA 12m+ M’brough 2022 % |
CLA 12m+ M’brough 2023 % |
CLA 12m+ M’brough 2024 % |
M’brough All children 2024 % |
All CLA M’brough 2024 % |
Early Years GLD |
41 |
42 |
46 |
27 |
44 |
22.2 |
62 |
38 |
KS2 R/W/M |
33 |
36 |
38 |
32 |
39 |
31 |
60 |
19 |
KS2 Reading |
52 |
55 |
58 |
52 |
44 |
56 |
71 |
39 |
KS2 Writing |
45 |
45 |
51 |
49 |
50 |
50 |
72 |
35 |
KS2 Maths |
52 |
46 |
44 |
52 |
50 |
50 |
72.7 |
35 |
KS4 Basics 4+ |
- |
- |
- |
18 |
16 |
14 |
55 |
15 |
KS4 Maths 4+ |
- |
- |
- |
21 |
24 |
24 |
59 |
26 |
KS4 English 4+ |
- |
- |
- |
30 |
29 |
24 |
66 |
26 |
In terms of a comparative analysis between
Middlesbrough and the wider regional and national data, the Board was advised
that although a good indication, it was important to be mindful that the
cohorts were small, for example: there were nine children in one of the cohorts
this year, and therefore any minor change could alter the statistics
significantly. In addition, it was
important to recognise and understand the caveats of the data, for example: the
support plans that were in place to help children to achieve. Members were advised that Key Stage 4 data
would be provided at a future meeting once it had been produced.
The Board heard that a ‘deep dive’ exercise had
recently been undertaken, which had resulted in seven issues being
identified. These were: Attendance;
Stability home and school; PEP quality; Suspensions; Quality of teaching and
learning; Sufficiency of SEN and AP places; and Change of Social Worker. In terms of next steps to address these
issues, these were outlined as follows:
·
PEP would be completed before a home move.
·
The school moves policy would be relaunched.
·
The school holiday request policy would be
relaunched.
·
There would be priority access to specialist
schools and AP without drift and delay.
·
EOTAs would be tracked and monitored through:
priority access to EP assessments; publishing of the Social Worker ed.
Handbook; and relaunch of the Virtual School drop ins.
A Member referred to placement moves that occurred
in Y11 and the impact that this had on the respective child’s education. It was queried whether there was either a
policy or formality in place to safeguard against moves in the final year. In response, it was explained that children
were not moved in that year unless something occurred that was outside the
control of the Local Authority; sometimes placements did break down. In such
situations discussions would take place, with the virtual school being involved
to help avoid any disruption.
A Member referred to the issue around the
recruitment and retention of social workers.
It was queried what impact a high turnover of social workers had on the
welfare of children, and what evidence base there was for this. In response, the Board heard that a study had
been undertaken in 2015 by the Universities of Oxford and Bristol - ‘The
Educational Progress of Looked After Children in England: Linking Care and
Educational Data’. A link to the
research paper would be provided to Members following the meeting. The Director of Children’s Care referred to
the Council’s recruitment strategy and commented that there had been increased
stability in terms of recruitment and retention more recently.
A Member commented that Y10 forms part of the GCSE
programme and that children should not have been moved during this year. In response, the Head of Virtual School
explained that there was national guidance around this; children should not
have been moved during key stages.
AGREED that:
1.
The Virtual School Head would provide a
link to the research referred to during her presentation, which noted the
factors that contributed to good educational outcomes for CLA.
2.
The information, as provided, was noted.