The Director of Environment and Community Services submitted
an exempt report in connection with the review of Private Hire Vehicle Driver Licence,
Ref: 23/25, where circumstances had arisen which required special consideration
by the Committee.
The Chair introduced those present and outlined the
procedure to be followed. The driver, who was in attendance at the
meeting, verified his name and address and confirmed he had received a copy of
the report and understood its contents.
The Licensing Manager presented a summary of the report
outlining that the driver appeared before Members in relation to convictions
recorded against him as shown at 1) & 2) in the report. The Committee was
advised that the driver had been licensed as a Private Hire Vehicle Driver with
Middlesbrough Council since 6 November 2023. His current licence was due to
expire on the 31 October 2025.
On 12 January 2025, Licensing Officers received an email
from the driver, stating that he had received 3 penalty points on his driving
licence for a speeding offence.
On 5 May 2025, Licensing Officers received a further email
from the driver to report points on his licence.
On the 6 May 2025, a Licensing Officer replied to the driver
requesting further information regarding his penalty points along with the date
he had received them. On that same day the driver replied stating that he had
received 6 points for a conviction dated 1 May 2025.
On 6 May 2025, a Licensing Officer carried out a check on
the status of the driver’s DVLA driving licence that revealed he had 9 points
on his licence.
On 19 May 2025 the driver was interviewed by Licensing
Enforcement Officers and provided his explanation in relation to the motoring
convictions.
The driver was invited to address the Committee in support
of his case and responded to questions from Members of the Committee and the
Council’s Legal Representative.
It was confirmed that there were no further questions and
the driver and Officers of the Council, other than representatives of the
Council’s Legal and Democratic Services teams, withdrew from the meeting whilst
the Committee determined the review.
Subsequently, all parties returned, and the Chair announced
a summary of the Committee’s decision and highlighted that the driver would
receive the full decision and reasons within five working days.
ORDERED that Private Hire Vehicle Driver
Licence, Ref No: 23/25, be retained, but that the driver be issued with a
warning regarding his conduct, as follows:-
Authority to act
- Under Section 61 of the Local Government
Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1976 (“the Act”) the Committee may revoke or
suspend a private hire / hackney carriage vehicle driver’s licence on the
grounds that:
-
Since
the grant of the licence the Driver had been convicted of an offence involving
dishonesty, indecency or violence;
-
Since
the grant of the licence the driver had committed an offence or breached the
Act or the Town Police Clauses Act 1847;
-
for
any other reasonable cause.
- The Committee considered Section 61 of the
Act, the Middlesbrough Council Private Hire and Hackney Carriage Policy
2022 (“the Policy”), the report and representations made by the Driver.
- The review of the licence was considered
on its own particular facts and on its merits.
Decision
4. After
carefully considering all the information, the Licensing Committee decided to,
on this occasion, permit the driver to retain his licence, but issues a formal
warning to the driver.
Reasons
- The
driver appeared before the Committee as a result of the following
offences:
i.
Exceeding
speed limit on a motorway – 6 November 2024 date of conviction - £100 fine and
3 penalty points.
ii.
Breach
of requirements as to control of vehicle, use of mobile phone etc. – 1 May 2025
date of conviction - £40 fine, £106 costs and 6 penalty points.
- The Policy on convictions
were set out at Appendix G, Policy on the Relevance of Convictions,
Cautions, Reprimands, Warnings, Complaints and Character.
- It stated in the Policy that a serious
view would be taken regarding convictions for driving whilst using a
mobile phone or handheld device. A licence would not usually be granted
until at least five years had elapsed since the conviction.
- It was clear in the Policy
that the Council would generally follow the Policy but may depart from it
if there were good reasons to do so.
- It further stated that it may be
appropriate to depart from the general Policy in some cases, for example,
situations where the offence was isolated and there were mitigating
circumstances.
- The driver had been licensed as a Private
Hire Driver with Middlesbrough Council since 6 November 2023, with his
current licence due to expire on 31 October 2025.
- On 12 January 2025, Licensing Officers
received an email from the driver informing them that he had received 3
penalty points for a speeding offence.
- On 5 May 2025, the driver emailed
Licensing Officers again, to inform them that he had received 6 points on
his licence for the offence listed at 2 above.
- On 19 May 2025, the driver attended for
interview with Licensing Officers. In relation to the first offence the
driver recalled he was on an airport run during the early hours of the
morning when caught by a speed camera.
- The driver stated he was not immediately
aware of the offence as he had gone on holiday to the Ivory Coast and not
received notification until he had returned home in February. The Driver
stated that upon his return to the UK, he paid the fine and immediately
notified the Licensing department as soon as he was aware of the offence.
- The driver stated that he had no
passengers at the time and was on Cargo Fleet Lane, Middlesbrough when a
private hire job had come through on his phone. The driver stated that he
touched his phone to accept the job and was seen by a passing Police Officer.
- The driver stated he informed the Officer
that he did touch the screen but that it was to accept a job. The driver
was fined at Court and points were endorsed on his licence.
- At the Committee hearing, the driver
stated that he did touch the screen but stressed that his phone was in a
bracket not obscuring his view. The driver also stated that he understood
that he had failed to notify the Licensing department within 48 hours but
did notify them as quickly as he could.
- The Committee understood and agreed that
it could not go behind the conviction and that the two offences were not
acceptable. The Committee did consider the driver’s mitigating
circumstances and the explanation that he gave for the offences. The
Committee determined that the mitigating circumstances were overwhelming
in this instance and the explanations given by the driver at the hearing.
- The Committee in this instance, decided to
depart from the Policy and decided that a formal warning as to the
driver’s behavior was appropriate to educate the driver.
- The driver was reminded of the Policy
expectations as well as the Code of Conduct, and that this must be adhered
to going forward.
- This decision was final and there was no
internal or statutory route of appeal, however, the driver had the option
of judicially reviewing the lawfulness of the decision to the high court
if grounds had been made out. Should the driver decide by way of judicial
review, he would be advised to seek independent legal advice as to the
grounds and time limits that may apply
- Should the driver decide to take this
course of action the Council would apply for any costs incurreds in
defending its decision.