Report for decision and submission to Council.
Decision:
ORDERED the Executive to approve that the following are
forwarded to
Council for approval:
AGREED the Executive:
·
General Fund balance - £11.100m
·
Unrestricted Usable Earmarked reserves –
£14.837m
Minutes:
The Executive Member for Finance submitted a report for Executive consideration which set out the proposed 2026/27 Revenue Budget, Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP), and Council Tax proposals following the publication of the Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement.
The report outlined key financial assumptions, Government funding allocations, service demand pressures, proposed budget growth, and the recommended Council Tax position for 2026/27, and requested that the Executive approved a series of recommendations for referral to Full Council at its meeting on 18 February 2026.
Members noted that Government funding through the Fair Funding Allocation totalled £130.960m, an increase of £14.171m, and that the Council’s Core Spending Power was forecast to increase by £57.369m (28.3%) between 2025/26 and 2028/29. A balanced MTFP had been achieved for all four years, with a proposed Net Revenue Budget of £200.675m for 2026/27. The Mayor and Executive proposed no increase in core Council Tax but a 2% Adult Social Care precept, resulting in a Band D charge of £2,115.86.
Members acknowledged the significant service demand pressures and re‑basing requirements amounting to £15.549m in 2026/27, alongside the proposal to remove £2.458m of previously approved savings that were no longer achievable. It also noted the proposals for £6.460m of service budget growth, aligned with Council Plan priorities, and £0.499m of corporate demand pressures, as well as the continuation of the Member‑Led Ward Schemes budget. Details of the proposed Capital Programme were provided, totalling £183.741m over 2026/27–2029/30, together with the 2026/27 Flexible Use of Capital Receipts Strategy amounting to £5.789m.
The recommendations on reserves were noted, including maintaining the General Fund at a minimum of £11.1m and building the Financial Resilience Reserve to £10m in 2026/27, rising to £20m by 2029/30. It also considered the outcomes of the public consultation, which saw 54% support for the 2% Council Tax proposal, and received an update on the Dedicated Schools Grant, with an indicative allocation of £222.114m and a forecast cumulative deficit of £31.213m at 31 March 2026.
Members proposed a series of amendments to the report which following a vote, were agreed. The budgets for the Members’ Small Scheme programme for 2025/26 and 2026/27 were reprofiled to reflect the earlier decision to allocate £150,000 for 2025/26 and £120,000 for 2026/27. It was further agreed to roll forward the £6,400 underspend from 2025/26 to 2026/27 and to bring forward £7,500 from 2027/28, resulting in a total allocation of £133,900 for 2026/27 to cover all eligible schemes proposed for that year.
In relation to Pest Control, the committee agreed that the wording be amended in Appendix 3 to clarify that increased capacity would enable the Council to extend the service beyond back alleys and open spaces to domestic properties, ensuring it was clear that the expanded offer focused on key public health pests. This amendment was made to avoid the wording being interpreted as applying to offices or shops, and it was noted that a separate report would follow setting out detailed operational arrangements.
Members were advised that the proposed budget had been shaped through close working with colleagues across the Council and had been underpinned by what was described as “a simple ABC” of core principles: A – ensuring the budget was affordable, B – delivering clear benefits for residents, and C – cementing the Council’s financial position.
It was highlighted that significant financial risks remained, particularly within Children’s Services. In relation to Council Tax, members noted that a 0% increase would have contradicted the strong advice issued in the briefing the previous week, and that an increase below 2% was considered insufficient to meet rising Children’s Services costs. Members acknowledged that a very low or no increase would not have reflected the Council’s current financial circumstances, could have sent the wrong message to central government, and might have been detrimental in future years, particularly given the three‑year phased settlement which only provided part of the funding uplift in year one.
In discussing service priorities, members recognised that although the Council could have chosen not to grow services, residents did not yet feel that service levels were where they should be. Continued investment, mature decision‑making and a focus on key services, including youth provision and pest control, were therefore considered essential. It was noted that pest control remained a town‑wide service and that frontline services more generally required strengthening. Members also heard that even at the end of the three‑year financial process, the Council would remain £50m short of previous funding levels, making it important to continue rebuilding services that had historically been underfunded and acknowledging that the phased settlement did not allow a return to earlier budget levels.
Members expressed a range of views regarding the broader impact of the budget. Members noted the benefits for neighbourhoods, elderly residents and children, and welcomed investment in CCTV, evidence‑gathering capability, the professional witness service, parenting support and over £500k per year for neighbourhood improvements. Members also highlighted town‑wide benefits, including the doubling of the caretaking team, investment in the becks team to improve their condition and reduce flood risk, and enhanced provision of park rangers. Members noted that the budget was refreshing and reflective of a more positive position, referencing the increasing complexity of Adult Social Care needs, improvements to frontline services, strengthened homelessness and domestic abuse support, a shift towards prevention, and alignment with the Adult Social Care Strategy. Members endorsed the approach in Children’s Services, recognising the importance of reducing reliance on external residential placements, the role of scrutiny in examining costs, and the value of programmes such as 10 x 10 in providing life‑changing opportunities for young people. Members also emphasised the need for flexibility for children in care and the critical contribution made by foster carers.
OPTIONS
ORDERED the Executive to approve that the following are
forwarded to
Council for approval:
AGREED the Executive:
·
General Fund balance - £11.100m
·
Unrestricted Usable Earmarked reserves –
£14.837m
REASONS
The forward planning and setting of a robust budget and
balanced MTFP ensures the Council can deliver services within its corporate and
financial framework and supports its vision for Middlesbrough as a thriving,
healthier, safer, and more ambitious place where communities can flourish. All
elected members are legally required to agree a balanced budget and set Council
Tax by 11 March 2026, and the Council must meet its Best Value duty by
demonstrating financial sustainability through a balanced MTFP covering at
least three years, with Full Council approval scheduled for 18 February 2026.
The recommendations support progress toward meeting these
statutory duties by enabling the Council to set a balanced revenue budget for
2026/27 and secure medium‑term financial sustainability, while taking a
systematic and controlled approach to addressing ongoing financial challenges
and delivering the Mayor’s priorities through the wider Council Plan.
Supporting documents: