Minutes:
The
Executive Member for Regeneration and the Director of Regeneration and Culture
submitted a report for the Executive’s consideration. The purpose of the report
was to set out the revised vision for the Stainsby
scheme and to seek the approval to conduct consultation with the view of
adopting the detailed masterplan as Design Guidance.
The
development planned to provide:
·
over
40 hectares of additional green public open space with planting of 18,000 to
25,000 native trees and shrubs;
·
a
commitment to the Council’s One Plant Living principles;
·
a
new Country Park;
·
community
amenities including play and sports provision; and,
·
housing within a landscaped setting.
The
Stainsby scheme situated in West Middlesbrough had
been allocated for housing in the Local Plan adopted in 2014. The 130 hectare
site was designated for a minimum of 1,670 dwellings in a mixed and balanced
residential community.
Stainsby North owned by Middlesbrough Council,
known locally as Mandale Meadow, formed part of the
overall Stainsby scheme and had been originally
earmarked for circa 100 dwellings.
As
part of the normal process of preparing the Stainsby
North site for development, notice of intention to dispose of public space and
notice of intention to appropriate open space for planning purposes was
required. In response, objections to the development of housing, a spine road
and the loss of green space had been received.
Following
elections in May, a review of all Greenfield developments, including the Stainsby scheme, was conducted. In respect to the Council
owned land at Stainsby North, it was proposed that
the area would not be developed for housing.
A
final draft of the masterplan was completed in November 2020 and was attached
as Appendix 1 of the submitted report.
Taking
into account both the public and political views in relation to the scheme, it
was proposed that the Stainton Way Western Extension (SWWE) had to proceed but
the allocated housing at Stainsby North did not.
The
new masterplan aimed to provide a vision of a sustainable, mixed and balanced
community set within an outstanding and engaging landscape, which included the
creation of a new Green Flag country park with the following features:
·
16ha
of new native woodland creation;
·
planting
c.18,000-25,000 native trees and shrubs;
·
1.6km
of new species rich/native hedgerow;
·
planting
c.16,000-24,000 hedging plants;
·
planting
100+ hedgerow trees;
·
planting
c.800 ornamental street trees and parkland trees; and,
·
planting c.300 fruit trees as part of public
orchards.
The
masterplan enhanced and extended existing habitats, such as Blue Bell Beck, Mandale Meadow and West Plantation, and created a wide
range of new habitats. Those would interact and flow throughout the development
providing a seamless transition between the built environment and the
countryside, facilitating the movement of wildlife and people.
Appendix
2 of the submitted report outlined the essential and desirable criteria that
needed to be achieved within the Country Park.
A
discussion ensued and Members highlighted the progress that had been made since
the original proposals were put forward and agreed in early 2019. Specific
reference was made to protecting the vast majority of the Council owned open
green space and that Mandale Meadow would no longer be
developed for housing.
Members
acknowledged public concerns in respect of the proposed access and the spine
road and encouraged residents to submit their views and opinions as part of the
consultation.
OPTIONS
As the largest single
housing allocation in the town, not taking forward the development, especially
the SWWE, would have had a catastrophic impact on the town’s overall housing
growth plans, and economic consequences for both the town and the Council’s
Medium Term Financial Plan.
Should the site not
come forward, the Council would have been at risk at not being able to maintain
a 5 year housing land supply, opening the Council up to challenge and it would
potentially lose control over where and how housing was delivered.
ORDERED
a)
That the revised vision
of the Stainsby scheme, as set out within the
detailed masterplan, be approved.
b)
That the consultation
process, required with stakeholders and the public, be approved to allow the
Council to adopt the detailed masterplan as Design Guidance.
REASONS
Design Guidance
Local Plans were
prepared by planning authorities, setting out a framework for the future
development of an area on a 15-year horizon. They defined the priorities for an
area, strategic policies, the framework for neighbourhood plans, land
allocations, infrastructure requirements, housing needs, requirements
for safeguarding the environment, measures for adapting to climate change and
so on. Local Plans were also the starting-point for considering whether
planning applications should be approved.
Design Guidance built
upon and provided more detailed guidance about policies in the Local Plan.
Legally, they did not form part of the Local Plan itself and they were not
subject to independent examination, but they were material considerations in
determining planning applications.
It was deemed necessary
to create and adopt a masterplan as Design Guidance, for the Stainsby scheme, to protect the vision of a landscape led
development. A Design Guide planned to set out a number of principles for the
scheme, including those in relation to the identified proposed Country Park and
green open space, protecting against future developments.
Public Consultation
To adopt the masterplan
as Design Guidance, the Council would be required to conduct public
consultation. The consultation would be carried out in line with the Council’s
Statement of Community Involvement.
The Statement of
Community Involvement set out the Council’s engagement framework on how and
when the community would be consulted on local planning policy documents.
Supporting documents: