A representative
from the Teeswide Safeguarding Adults Board and the
Director of Adult Social Care and Health Integration will be in attendance to
update Members on the Board’s Annual Report 2019/2020 and its Strategic
Business Plan 2020/2021.
Minutes:
The Independent
Chair of the Teeswide Safeguarding Adults Board (TSAB), and the Director of
Adult Social Care and Health Integration were in attendance at the meeting to
present information regarding TSAB’s annual report 2019/2020 and strategic plan
2020/2021.
The Director of
Adult Social Care and Health Integration provided an introductory overview of
the TSAB, providing details in relation to structure and functioning. It was explained that this had been a
particularly challenging year for TSAB in light of COVID-19, but work had
continued remotely, with face-to-face visits being undertaken where risk
assessments allowed. It was felt that
this continued delivery was testament to the dedication and flexibility of the
staff involved.
The Independent
Chair introduced himself to the Board and outlined details of his professional
background and experience. Members were
appraised of the Chair’s intentions for the TSAB over the coming year, which
would focus on the examination of cross-cutting issues, such as health,
community safety and safeguarding, and consider how these could be progressed
to further the Board’s efficiency and effectiveness. The report to be presented today was
retrospective rather than forward-looking, but feedback from Members in respect
of the Board’s priorities for 2021/2022 would be welcomed.
The Director of
Adult Social Care and Health Integration explained that there was a statutory
requirement within Adult Social Care to have a Safeguarding Adults Board; TSAB comprised
six statutory partners (i.e. Cleveland Police; Hartlepool Borough Council;
Middlesbrough Council; Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council; Stockton-on-Tees
Borough Council; and South Tees Clinical Commissioning Group and Hartlepool and
Stockton-on-Tees Clinical Commissioning Group), as well as 18 non-statutory
partners.
Reference was made
to the range of sub-groups that operated under the main Board. These were: Communication and Engagement;
Learning, Training and Development; Operational Leads; Performance, Audit and
Quality; and Policy, Practice and Procedure.
The Audit and Quality sub-group was chaired by the Director of Adult
Social Care and Health Integration. It
was acknowledged that although there was one shared over-arching group of
policies and procedures, safeguarding was undertaken slightly differently
across Tees, and therefore there was merit in the partners committing to work
in a more consistent way to achieve a greater utility from the data available.
Members heard that
in terms of investigative work and adult safeguarding, statutory investigations
entitled Section 42 Enquiries were carried out.
There had been a 66% increase in the number of Section 42 Enquiries for
adults aged 18-24 in the last year.
There had been a
decrease across the locality in respect of Safeguarding Concerns received from
care homes. Although this was welcomed,
it also raised some questions as to why this was the case. Consideration was given to COVID-19 and
related restrictions that had resulted in fewer staff entering care
homes/settings. Work was currently
taking place to determine reasoning around this.
There had been a
70% increase in Safeguarding Concerns received from NHS secondary care
settings, and more cases identified from Social Care itself. It had been a busy year, and it was indicated
that the numbers would stand out as being anomalous when the year was looked
back on in the future.
The report
detailed a variety of statistics in relation to the type of abuse being
reported, including neglect; acts of commission; physical abuse; financial
abuse; and modern slavery. A Breakdown
of the number of Safeguarding Concerns raised in each Local Authority area was
also provided.
A business plan
was included in the report, which detailed aims around protection, prevention,
partnership and professional accountability.
The TSAB documents were public and available on the TSAB website.
It was highlighted
that the purpose of the Board was to educate and raise awareness around adult
safeguarding. A Quality Assurance
Framework operated on an annual cycle, which provided opportunity to assess
whether a satisfactory safeguarding service was being delivered; a key aspect
of the Independent Chair’s role was to hold the statutory partners to account. It was indicated that there had been an
improvement in Middlesbrough’s Quality Framework returns this year.
The Independent
Chair referred to the TSAB website and highlighted the array of information
available for people to access. Mention
was also made to the live consultation activity currently taking place, which
was concerned with TSAB’s 2021/2022 priorities.
It was felt that, in particular, large change would relate to COVID-19
and how the Board responded to that.
In response to an
enquiry regarding the discharge of individuals with COVID-19 from hospitals
into care homes, the Director of Adult Social Care and Health Integration
advised that in the early stages of the pandemic, there had been some
individuals discharged from hospital without clarity on their COVID-19
status. This had been in response to
direction from Government, which was concerned with getting people out of
hospital, and was at a time when adherence to normal barriers and PPE was a
sufficient response. This had changed
over the course of the pandemic. It was
explained that the instruction from the Department of Health and Social Care
prior to Christmas was that anyone being discharged with a positive COVID-19
status was to be transferred to a designated setting, which was a care home
that had particularly been assessed by the CQC as being safe to accept
individuals who were COVID-19 positive.
These had been set-up in Middlesbrough, and still operated, although
they had not been widely used. It was
felt that the reasoning for this was that if individuals had been COVID-19
positive and released to a care home, in most instances they had been quite
unwell, and by the time they were fit enough to be released from hospital, the
isolation period would have passed. The
situation was far more stable now than it was previously.
Following an
enquiry raised in relation to restrictions around care home visits,
consideration was given to the impact that this had had on residents, their
families and care home staff. A number
of elements were noted, including: the need for care home staff to balance
individuals’ rights against collective safety; infection prevention control and
associated provisions; and focus upon the vaccination programme in moving
forwards.
The Chair thanked the Director of Adult Social Care and Health
Integration and the Independent Chair of TSAB for their attendance and
contributions to the meeting.
NOTED
Supporting documents: