The Executive Director of Children’s Services will provide the Panel with a verbal update in relation to the Ofsted focused visit to Children’s Services on 26 & 27 May 2021.
Minutes:
The Executive Director provided the
Panel with a presentation in relation to the Ofsted Focused Visit to Children’s
Services that took place on 26 and 27 May 2021.
A copy of the Ofsted letter, dated 15 July 2021, detailing its full findings
from the visit, had been circulated with the agenda prior to the meeting, for
information.
To provide context to the focused visit,
Ofsted’s overall aim was “How has England’s social care system delivered
child-centred practice and care within the context of the restrictions placed
on society during the pandemic?” For
Middlesbrough, this meant how this was delivered whilst continuing to improve.
The focused visit used the same
methodology as for the November/December 2019 inspection, looking across the
whole of Children’s Services. The visit
was undertaken by four Social Care Inspectors and one Education Inspector, who
were ‘on site’ for two days, however, prior to being on site, Children’s
Services supplied requested documentation and performance information and key
personnel were also interviewed.
In relation to Covid, the strategic
findings were as follows:-
·
Leaders
invoked their major incident plan swiftly and effectively (corporately).
·
A
framework for identifying and monitoring vulnerably children in their
communities was established.
·
Opportunities
for different ways of working were brought about across the Council as well as
revitalising partnerships.
·
Weekly
communications meetings with strategic partners were held to establish multi
agency pathways – for example Domestic Abuse pathway (this had been nationally
evaluated), and school networks.
·
Successful
progress on much of the Improvement Programme but some elements inevitably
effected by Covid.
The findings in relation to Covid from a
practice perspective were:-
·
Some
Social Workers were creative and persistent in their engagement with children
despite restrictions imposed by lockdown.
·
Staff
had benefitted from Covid-safe working practices and technology to support
engagement with children and families.
·
Despite
the challenges of last year, staff reported feeling supported and liked working
for Middlesbrough and understood the vision for change.
·
The
numbers of Electively Home Educated (EHE) children increased during the
pandemic, however, Children’s Services had effective systems in place to
monitor electively home educated (EHE) children.
In terms of Leadership, Ofsted found
that Leaders were positively engaged in a comprehensive programme of improvement
and introduced:-
·
Audit
to Excellence Framework – a comprehensive plan measuring quality of practice
through auditing.
·
‘Non-negotiables’
Practice Standards – expectations of how Social Workers should work using core
standards.
Ofsted also found that Children’s
Services had:-
·
Appropriately
prioritised recruitment and the development of the Workforce Strategy.
·
Recognised
the variability in practice which was not meeting their own expectations
regarding quality of practice.
·
Did
not yet have a sufficient understanding of children who were missing
education. (This applied to a small
cohort of children)
The Panel was informed that the main
overall findings were:-
·
Demand
for Children’s Social Care Services had increased over the last year.
·
The
MACH had continued to improve.
·
Caseloads
were reducing but remained too high for some Social Workers.
·
Children
were seen regularly and direct work was making a demonstrable difference to
their lives.
·
Workers
were persistent and built good relationships with children so that
interventions were more effective.
·
Personal
Advisers maintained regular contact with care leavers.
·
There
was effective partnership work to identify exploitation risks and trends.
·
Social
Workers were increasingly working with children who had multiple and complex
needs. This was as a result of a legacy
of poor practice.
Ofsted also identified the following
areas for improvement:-
·
Quality
of assessments and plans was variable and management oversight and supervision
was not suitably evaluative. (Oversight
was currently more directive and needed to develop to include more evaluation
of the work being undertaken).
·
Children
came into care when they needed to but there was some delay in finding the
right homes for them.
·
Lack
of suitable foster placements and children’s homes. (This was both internal and external and it
was highlighted that Middlesbrough was trying to develop internal provision).
·
Too
many care leavers were not in education, employment or training.
·
Children’s
identities and diverse needs were not given sufficient consideration. (This was not only in relation to ethnicity
and culture, but about working with the whole child, for example, did the child
have a particular health need, or mental health need).
·
Some
children experienced too many changes of Social Worker. Children told inspectors they would like to
have Social Workers that stayed with them for a long time.
In relation to education matters, there
was a significant focus on children missing education. Ofsted found that there were effective
systems in place to monitor electively home educated (EHE) children. However, Children's Services had insufficient
knowledge of the circumstances of vulnerable children who were missing
education so that their needs were not being met. This included a small cohort of children
looked after who were on a reduced timetable or who had experienced no
education for too long; some children with special education needs did not
receive a school placed within the 20 day timescale; and, a very small number
of the aforementioned children attended unregistered provision on a part time
basis as their sole provision.
Finally, Ofsted had made two new
recommendations, as follows:-
·
Management
oversight and actions to ensure that vulnerable children and children in care,
including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND),
received their full educational entitlement.
·
The
understanding of identity and the diverse needs of children and their families
to inform assessment, planning and support.
Overall, it was a positive outcome
showing that Children’s Services ‘knew themselves’ and what needed to be done.
In terms of the next steps, the
Children’s Commissioner was in the process of finalising his 12-month review
report to the Minister, having been with Children’s Services during the week
commencing 12 July 2021. This report
would be brought to the Panel once it was available. It was also expected that a further Ofsted
Monitoring Visit would take place towards the end of the year/start of next
year.
A discussion ensued and the following
issues were raised:-
·
Reference
was made to the finding that ‘there was a lack of suitable foster placements”
and it was queried what was being done to try and rectify this. The Executive Director advised that
recruitment of foster carers was a continuous process but it was acknowledged
that there had been a net loss of foster carers over the last year partly due
to different ways of working being introduced which had led to some carers,
regrettably, resigning. In addition,
there was also a shortage of external independent (IFA) foster placements and
residential placements. Whilst the
number of children looked after had reduced in Middlesbrough, other local
authorities were seeing a rise in numbers, making external placements more
difficult to source. Children’s Services
had also had some success in bringing children from external provision into
internal provision and continued to try and build its own internal residential
provision, including the opening of Daniel Court and the refurbishment of an
existing residential home which would soon be available again for
placements. It was highlighted that some
children looked after had very complex and specific needs which often meant
they required specialist placements which were more expensive.
·
Reference
was made to the Ofsted findings that ‘children are seen regularly and direct
work is making a demonstrable difference to their lives’ and ‘the quality of assessments
and plans is variable’, and it was queried how the two correlated and whether
it was a ‘paperwork’ issue. The
Executive Director explained that particularly in the longer term teams, Social
Workers built up relationships with children and were often better at
understanding children than they were at writing it down. Assessments and plans needed to be more
reflective. Other reasons for the
variability of assessments and plans could include caseloads, the numbers of
newly qualified social workers, turnover, handover of work and training
opportunities and standards needed to be implemented. This was one of the reasons for continual
audit to assess improvements in practice.
AGREED that
the information provided be noted.
Supporting documents: