The Mayor of Middlesbrough / Executive Member for
Adult Social Care and Public Protection / Lead Executive Member for Children’s
Safeguarding, Mayor Preston, will
be in attendance to update the Board on his aims and aspirations, progress made
to date and to highlight any emerging issues relating to his portfolios.
Minutes:
The Mayor / Executive Member for Adult Social Care
and Public Protection and Lead Member for Children’s Safeguarding, Mayor Andy
Preston, was in attendance to update the Board on his aims and aspirations,
progress made to date and to highlight any emerging issues relating to his
portfolios.
The following officers were also in attendance: the
Executive Director of Children’s Services; the Director of Adult Social Care
and Health Integration; and the Director of Public Health.
As part of his update to the Board, the Mayor
discussed his portfolio under three areas – Children’s Services, Adult Services
and Public Protection and Mayoral.
Children’s Services
·
In the past Middlesbrough children were let down and it was the most
vulnerable and most precious that were let down. Over two years ago OFSTED had
deemed Middlesbrough’s Children’s Services’ Department inadequate and there had
been several options open to the Government.
·
The Mayor advised that today, from all of the information he had
available he was reassured that our Children’s Services Department was now
heading in the right direction. The Commissioner appointed to work with our
Children’s Services Department had recently recommended to the Government Minister
that our Children’s Services Department remain under the Council’s control and
an imminent decision from the Minister was anticipated.
·
The Mayor expressed the view that in the future he believed
Middlesbrough’s Children’s Services Department could be a beacon of good
practice and set national standards.
·
An area where improvement was needed was in the number of children
absent from school. In any one day 10 per cent of Middlesbrough children were
absent and this figure was not evenly spread throughout the towns demographic.
This figure was far worse than the national average. The 10 per cent was
frequently concentrated on those that needed the most from education including
the role models, learning and social interaction. Improvement in this area was
a real priority.
·
The staff in Children’s Services had been fantastic over the last two
years and it was acknowledged that there would always be some agency staff.
However, dependency on agency staff was reducing. Huge strides had been made
under the current Executive Director of Children’s Services leadership.
Following the update in respect of Children’s
Services, Members were afforded the opportunity to ask questions.
A Member enquired as to the number of children
currently in care in Middlesbrough, as previously these numbers had been in the
700’s. It was also queried as to how the Council was performing in terms of
Social Worker recruitment and retention. The Executive Director of Children’s
Services advised that the numbers of looked after children in Middlesbrough had
decreased significantly. In the period since August 2020 the number had reduced
to 539, a reduction of approximately 160 children, which was significant
progress. It was advised that some of those children should never have been in
our care. OFSTED had previously commented in their inspection, almost two years
ago, that Middlesbrough was not moving children to their forever homes as
swiftly as was needed. Children were now being moved onto their adoptive homes,
they had also been a number of children who were placed at home on Care Orders
with parents, whereby the local authority had parental responsibility and these
had taken time to work through but great progress had been made. It was
emphasised that the number of children looked after in Middlesbrough would
always be higher than the national average, owing to Middlesbrough’s unique
circumstances. However, the number of children looked after would continue to
decrease. It was advised that the numbers would come down more slowly now.
In terms of the numbers of Social Workers it was
advised that the department had a Workforce Development Strategy and within
that there was a recruitment and retention drive. A new website had been
developed and the link would be forwarded to Members of the Board, which was
focussed on recruiting experienced Social Workers. The aim was to bring the
figures down to 15 per cent agency Social Workers and that was in line with the
national benchmark. It was advised that this was being tracked on a six weekly
basis by LMT. The exact percentage was unknown at this stage but this would be
forwarded to the Board. It was acknowledged that this was a national issue but
that significant efforts were being made to ensure Middlesbrough was an
employer of choice.
A Member of the Board made reference to the
increase in the number of children that were now being cared for by in-house
Foster Cares and had returned to Middlesbrough, which could only be beneficial
for the children. The Mayor advised that the number of looked after children
being placed out of area had been reduced and baring exceptional circumstances
the aim was for all Middlesbrough children to be cared for in Middlesbrough.
The Executive Director of Children’s Services echoed these comments and made
the point that when children and young people were away from Middlesbrough and
went missing they generally returned to Middlesbrough, as this was where they
felt comfortable. Finding agency residential placements was extraordinarily
difficult and Middlesbrough was developing its own provision, including
building our own facilities and refurbishing / maximising our own residential
Children’s homes. There was a general drive to use our own resources. Reference
was made to the proxy indicators that had been developed for the department,
one of which was the reduction in the number of young people in external
residential care and these would be provided to the Board.
In response to a query it was advised that the
average case load per Social Worker in Middlesbrough was 19.9 FTE, which was a
slight increase from 19.2 in June and a decrease from the high experience in
October 2020 when it was 24.3. The highest caseloads were 26.4 per cent had
16-20 on their caseload and 2-.6 per cent had 21-25 children open. 15.4 per cent
had 26-30. One of the highest caseloads at the moment was in the Children with
Disabilities Team. Caseloads in Early Help were too high at the moment, they
were 31 children per worker, higher than the service target. The service was
therefore working with more children at an early help level but there was a
need to encourage partner agencies to become the lead professional in working
with those children. Schools were a lead partner for a considerable number of
children at the early help level but there was a real need to support health to
undertake this role more. It was also acknowledged that post COVID demand was
high for Children’s Services across the board was high.
Adult Services, Public Protection and Public Health
Following the update in respect of Adult Services,
Public Protection and Public Health, Members were afforded the opportunity to
ask questions.
A Member made reference to the Heroin Addicted
Treatment (HAT) programme currently delivered in the town and whether he was in
favour of such programmes. The Mayor expressed the view that it was a good
project, despite it being controversial, however the evidence was there that it
did had a role and that the programme could help to reduce crime and help
individuals recover. It also had a ripple effect on members of their family and
wider community. It was not the answer to everything but there were some
candidates that would benefit.
Reference was made to the backlog in hospital
appointments and whether a proactive approach could be taken to offer drop-in
style centres for particular ailments. The Mayor expressed the view that he was
in favour of such provision and there would be a huge challenge ahead with
advanced cancers and heart problems if early screening was not prioritised.
In response to a query on the proposed additional
1p on income tax to help pay for Adult Social Care the Mayor expressed the view
that there was something wrong when an individual of modest means is forced to
pay for care when someone who had not been as frugal was receiving it for free.
In an ideal world all care would be free but currently that was a step too much
too soon and therefore there was a need to scale it in, to enable people to
have more assets in their house was the right thing. There had to be a line
somewhere and the Government’s move was a step in the right direction.
The Director of Adult Social Care and Health
Integration advised that as a local authority Middlesbrough had relatively few
people who funded all of their own care. Middlesbrough had high percentage of
people for who the local authority paid a contribution or funded the whole cost
of an individual’s care. The Government was changing the threshold so that
anyone with over £23,000 would pay for their own care whereas in the future
anyone with over £100,000 would be paying for all of their own care. The
Government had also introduced a cap whereby no one would pay more than £86,000
for their care over their lifetime. Work would therefore need to be undertaken
to establish what formulas would be applied in respect of the money allocated
to individual local authorities by Government in the future and how this would
impact on Middlesbrough financially.
Mayoral
Members were afforded the opportunity to ask
questions.
A Member made reference to the already high level
of Middlesbrough’s Council Tax collection arrears and asked the Mayor for his
views on this issue. In response the Mayor advised that Middlesbrough would
always be challenged in respect of this issue. However, the Council had adopted
a new approach through the Stop the Knock Campaign and had stopped using Bailiffs
to collect Council Tax. The rate of people in arrears had declined since the
new approach had been adopted. In addition the Council had undertaken work with
the ethical lettings company to help tenants through difficult times. The Mayor
expressed the view that none payment of Council Tax was not acceptable and
intelligent ways to work with people to encourage them to pay had been adopted.
In respect of the recently approved £1m investment
by the Executive to bring 125 empty homes in the town up to standard it was
queried how the Mayor envisaged the scheme would work and if the funding
allocated would be sufficient. The Mayor advised that in some areas there were
a number of boarded up properties that needed to be dealt with, as they caused
huge issues for people living on those streets. Often the properties were owned
by absentee landlords and they needed to be made habitable in order to improve our
local streets for all of the residents and generate income from the Council.
The Mayor acknowledged that it was unknown as to whether £1m would be a sufficient
level of funding to bring 125 homes up to standard but it would be a good starting
point.
The view was expressed by a Member of the Board
that there was also a need to improve the business / commercial stock in
Middlesbrough. The Mayor acknowledged this suggestion and stated that in his
view there was a need to name and shame those that failed to take action to
ensure their business / commercial properties were not left in a state that brought
Middlesbrough down and impacted negatively on people’s mental and physical
health. Action was being taken in respect of this issue and discussions were
ongoing about the various options open to the local authority.
The Chair thanked the Mayor and officers for their
attendance and contributions to the meeting.
AGREED that the information provided be noted, and the agreed action be
undertaken.
Supporting documents: