Officers
from the Local Authority and the NHS will be in attendance to provide the
Scrutiny Panel with:
a) key data in respect of special
educational needs and disabilities in Middlesbrough, specifically data on type
of needs and pupil characteristics and how these compare regionally and
nationally; and
b) a detailed overview of how
Education, Social Care and Health work collectively to deliver SEND provision
at a local level, including information on the SEND Strategy and the SEND
Strategic Group.
Minutes:
Officers from the Local Authority and the NHS
were in attendance to provide the scrutiny panel with further information in
respect of its current review of Special Educational Needs and Disabilities
(SEND). The
Strategic Lead for the Inclusion and Specialist Support Service advised that
the submitted report, which had been circulated with the agenda pack,
contained:
a)
key
data in respect of special educational needs and disabilities in Middlesbrough,
specifically data on type of needs and pupil characteristics and how those
compared regionally and nationally; and
b)
a
detailed overview of how education, social care and health worked collectively
to deliver SEND provision at a local level, including information on the SEND
Strategy and the SEND Strategic Group.
Members were also informed that a copy of the
SEND Strategy had been circulated with the agenda papers. It was advised that
the SEND Strategy had recently been updated and shared across the local area.
In respect of the strategy, briefing sessions were currently being arranged for
October/November and colleagues across education, health and social care would
be invited to attend.
Members heard that The Children and Families
Act and the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Code of Practice (2014
updated 2015) transformed the system for disabled children and young people and
those with Special Educational Needs (SEN), ensuring that services consistently
supported them to achieve positive outcomes. The scrutiny panel was provided
with a brief outline of the SEND Code of Practice 0-25. The reforms had created
a system from birth to 25 through the development of coordinated assessment of
a single Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP), which aimed to improve cooperation
between all services responsible for providing education, health and/or social
care and giving parents and young people greater choice and control over their
support.
Alongside the SEND Code of Practice, the Local
Area SEND Inspection Framework had been implemented. In 2017, Ofsted and the
Care Quality Commission (CQC) conducted a joint inspection of the local area of
Middlesbrough. Following the inspection, the local area was required to produce
and submit a Written Statement of Action, focussing on four areas, which aimed
to:
·
develop
stronger leadership and governance at all levels to ensure that the SEND Code
of Practice was fully implemented across the local area;
·
introduce
greater strategic planning for the joint commissioning of services across
education, health and social care;
·
improve
the local offer and its co-production with families; and
·
utilise
data to drive improvement in provision and promote positive outcomes for
children and young people who had SEND in the local area.
The local area was revisited in 2019 and
inspectors commented that significant and sustained progress had been made in
respect of the four priority areas and the implementation of the SEND Code of
Practice. As a result, the local area no longer required formal monitoring from
Ofsted or the CQC.
Members were advised that the Local Area SEND
Inspection Framework was currently being updated/revised and it was anticipated
that the new framework would include children and young people at risk of
exclusion and those requiring access to Alternative Provision. It was
anticipated that further updates on, and revisions of, the framework would be
shared later in the year.
Members were informed that, to ensure the local
area continued to meet its statutory duties and responsibilities (as outlined
within the SEND Code of Practice), a SEND Strategic Group had been established.
In terms of
membership, the group had representation from the Local Authority, health,
educational settings and parents. The SEND Strategic Group provided challenge
and oversight and reported to the Children’s Trust on a regular basis. The
group had developed a number of work streams, which focussed on areas linked to
the key priorities, as identified within the SEND Strategy. Through the work of the
SEND Strategic Group, the local area continued to move forward with key
developments to ensure that the needs of children and young people with SEND
0-25 in Middlesbrough were being met.
The scrutiny panel was advised that the key
work stream action plans, linked to the key priorities in the SEND Strategy,
focussed on:
·
Data,
Quality and Outcomes
·
SEND
Sufficiency Planning: Education
·
Joint
Commissioning
·
Preparing
for Adulthood
·
Workforce
Development
·
Behaviour
Partnership
In respect of each work stream,
self-evaluations were undertaken and the SEND Strategic Group regularly shared
best practice regionally and nationally.
Members were advised that the key priorities of
the SEND Strategic Group were:
a)
To
further develop strategic leadership across education, health and social care
and identify and remove barriers to learning and support, resulting from
COVID-19.
b)
To
ensure greater involvement of children, young people and families to support
co-production, ensuring that their voices were heard and feedback was used to
inform service delivery.
c)
To
ensure greater analysis and use of information to provide sufficient local
educational provision and to drive improvement in provision through the use of
data. In addition, improve systems for capturing softer outcomes for children
and young people who had special educational needs and/or disabilities
d)
To
further improve strategic planning to support joint commissioning of services
across education, health and social care.
e)
To
improve processes and opportunities for children and young people in
preparation for adulthood.
f)
To
have a trained and competent workforce to meet the needs of children and young
people with SEND.
In terms of working across education, health
and social care, the scrutiny panel received information on:
·
improving
support for children and young people with autism;
·
COVID-19;
and
·
The
Preparing for Adulthood Conference.
The Head of Inclusion, Assessment and Review
and the Clinical Officer provided the scrutiny panel with an overview of the
work that was being undertaken to improve support for children and young people
with autism.
The Head of Inclusion, Assessment and Review
advised that there was an increasing number of children and young people being
identified with autism and in particular, an increasing number of children with
autism who had an EHCP and required some form of additional or specialist
provision. Members heard that, for that specific cohort of children, there had
not been a sufficient number of places to educate them locally and out of area
placements were being used. To meet demand, and in light of feedback received
from families, work was undertaken by education, health and social care to
analyse data in respect of future projections in the short, medium and
long-term. Following analysis, it was identified that there was a lack of
secondary provision and the number of local specialist education placements
needed to increase. It was evident that a secondary autism base, within a
mainstream setting, required development to ensure more children and young
people could access the support they required within the local area.
To meet demand, work was undertaken to develop
an autism resource base at Acklam Grange School and changes
were made to an existing base at Outwood Academy Acklam. The development of those bases enabled the Local
Authority to build its capacity to educate children with autism within
secondary settings. Work had also been undertaken with Abbey Hill School, which
was based in Stockton and part of the Horizons Trust, to open a small satellite
provision called 'Fairfax Provision'. The provision was set up in September
2020 at Hollis Academy to support young people with autism in
Middlesbrough. It was explained that,
over a five year period, places available locally had increased up to 75.
As a result of increasing local education
provision for those with autism, positive feedback had been received from
families.
The Clinical Officer provided the scrutiny
panel with information on the needs-led neurodevelopmental pathway for children
and young people with autism. Feedback from parents identified that they had
encountered long waiting times to receive a diagnosis for their child. In light
of the feedback received, it was identified that a focus on needs, rather than
diagnosis, was required. Parents had identified the need to access help and
support at the earliest of stages. Significant investment had been made to
develop a bubble of support and the family support service. There had also been
investment in specialist services, such as the joint commissioning of a service
to provide speech and language therapy for 0-25. It was added that the service
was currently being reviewed/evaluated alongside parents and carers, with an
aim to develop/improve support.
Members were informed that the Sunflower
Project focussed on occupational therapy and involved delivery of information
and strategies. The project aimed to provide parents/carers/educational
settings with the ability to delivery lifelong support to children who
experienced sensory integration difficulties.
In terms of the key worker service, the service
was delivered by Daisy Chain, which was a Stockton based charity providing a
range of support services to children and adults affected by autism. It had
been determined by the Transforming Care and the NHS Long Term Plan that a key
worker would be allocated to children with a learning disability or autism.
That key worker support had been widened by the local area to include those
children who were demonstrating autistic traits or had entered the SEND
pathway. That change planned to meet the needs of those requiring support, at
the earliest of stages. Children, from the age of 3, and their families were
able to access support from a key worker, such as sleep training and sensory
training. The key worker also enabled the family to coordinate and navigate
services.
Members heard that the local area had developed
a new improved neurodevelopmental diagnostic pathway, which had previously sat
within the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS). There was now a
dedicated Neurodevelopmental Team, who were skilled in the early identification
of autistic traits. There was a multi-agency triage panel, which covered
specialist areas such as speech and language therapy, psychology, clinical
psychiatry and occupational therapy. In addition, an autism coordinator
provided direct support to families. The triage panel aimed to ensure that, if
a child did not meet the criteria to enter the autism pathway for a diagnosis,
the family would be provided with care and support through signposting, key
workers and the family support service.
As a result of COVID-19, the local area had
identified all those children and young people with EHCPs and undertook risk
assessments. That work enabled the identification and sharing of information
across agencies. Education, health and social care worked collectively to
identify and prioritise children and young people with higher needs, ensuring
they received the required support swiftly. By working collectively, a direct
and coordinated approach was established to ensure the needs of children and
young people were met during the pandemic. Weekly multi-agency meetings were
held, with families, to ensure seamless support was provided, without delay.
Improved data sharing was also introduced, which had led to a robust data
sharing agreement between the provider trusts and the Local Authority. The
agreement allowed the long-term sharing of data and information, in respect of
needs, at a child-level.
In terms of the multi-agency risk management
that had been undertaken by education, health and social care throughout the
pandemic, a case study example was provided. The Head of Inclusion, Assessment
and Review advised that a social worker had identified that, during lockdown, a
family had been struggling to cope. The child had significant additional
learning needs and was extremely clinically vulnerable. The child was unable to
attend an educational setting as the risk to the child’s health was too great.
The family had reported challenges at home with children being out of school
and problems with continence service deliveries. The social worker had concerns
that the added pressure was impacting on the relationships within the family
home. As a result, the social worker had made a referral to the multi-agency
risk management group. Upon receipt of the referral, work was undertaken across
all agencies to commission additional Home Support via social care during the
day time. That support was provided by utilising funding from education. The
group also liaised with the school to support learning and coordinated with the
continence service to resolve the issue around failed deliveries. As a result of
the group’s work, Home Support was well received by the family, the continence
service delivery issue was resolved and the family reported being “in a much
better place” since the interventions.
In 2019, a Preparing for Adulthood Conference
was held for young people. The conference was organised, led and facilitated by
young people. The conference delivered a series of interactive workshops to
encourage feedback from young people. That feedback was then utilised to inform
service delivery and focus improvement work, which was led by the multi-agency
Preparation for Adulthood Group. Feedback received from young people indicated:
·
the
Local Offer website needed to be more young person friendly;
·
more
employment opportunities were required; and
·
more
independence in school and college was required.
In light of the feedback received, the Local
Offer website was reviewed and its content was improved to include more case
studies, diagrams, images and videos. When the website had initially been
set-up, it had been receiving approximately 33,000 hits a month, the website
was now receiving over 100,000 a month. In addition, the number of supported
internship placements, available locally, had been increased. In 2015, there
had been three internships that had now increased to 34. Furthermore, feedback
was shared with post-16 providers, resulting in the development of the
curriculum to include delivery of new courses and modules around independence.
Following the conference, young people had commented that they felt their
views, opinions and feedback were valued.
At the conference, it had also been conveyed by
young people that they wished to celebrate their achievements and success. As a
result, a celebration event was arranged - the Young People’s Achievement
Awards. There were 10 categories and the event provided schools and settings
with the opportunity to nominate young people to receive an award.
A Member raised a query in respect of the
recent restructuring and reshaping of the service. In response, the Strategic
Lead for the Inclusion and Specialist Support Service advised that the service
and local offer had been improved/developed following the analysis and review
of data, the high needs budget, the joint commissioning of services, the
changing needs of children and young people in the local area and feedback
received from families. In addition, the Clinical Officer commented that the
NHS Long Term Plans focussed on the reviewing of pathways, linking with the
voluntary sector and improving services to support those with SEND and autism.
It was commented that improvements and developments were outcome-based,
ensuring families had access to seamless support.
In light of the new inspection framework, which
planned to include children and young people at risk of exclusion, a Member
raised a query in respect of the number of exclusions. In response, the Head of
Inclusion, Assessment and Review advised that last year there were five less
permanent exclusions than the previous year, which was significant and
demonstrated that the new inclusion and outreach model was positively impacting
on exclusion rates. It was anticipated that the new model would continue to
reduce the level of exclusions.
A Member raised a query regarding signposting
and support for English as an additional language (EAL) learners with SEND and
their families. In response, the Head of Achievement advised that guidance was
translated and circulated by the Ethnic Minority Achievement Team (EMAT) and
the team provided multi-agency support to ensure the needs of families were
met.
In response to a Member’s query regarding
non-SEND pupils not being accepting of SEND Pupils, it was advised that SEND
cohort pupils were very much integrated into mainstream schooling, therefore,
to date an instance such as that had never been reported.
A Member referred to the development of the
secondary autism resource bases at Acklam Grange
School and Outwood Academy Acklam
and queried whether additional places were still required. In response, the
Head of Inclusion, Assessment and Review advised that following the analysis of
data it was confirmed that the 75 places would be sufficient to meet local
demand in the short, medium and long-term. However, it was advised that there
was a need for regular monitoring to future proof the area’s sufficiency and
local places.
A Member raised a query in respect of data and
the possibility of some pupils having unidentified SEND. In response, the
Strategic Lead for the Inclusion and Specialist Support Service advised that
the new outreach and inclusion model assisted with identifying needs at the
earliest of stages. The Head of Access to Education added that a piece of work
was c being undertaken to establish ways to better support and provide a fast
track approach, with increased flexibility, for Looked After Children with
undiagnosed SEND.
AGREED
That the
information presented at the meeting be considered in the context of the
scrutiny panel's investigation.
Supporting documents: