Minutes:
The Executive Member for Environment and
Finance & Governance and the Director of Finance submitted a report for the
Executive’s consideration. The purpose of the report was to present the
proposal to transfer the Council’s freehold interest of the International
Centre to a community organisation.
In 2020, the Council had granted a license for
a community interest company, The Other Perspective, to take occupation in the
International Centre. Its location was central to assisting the organisation to
serve the local community. The community interest company had also previously
requested consideration for a community asset transfer of the building.
The International Centre itself was in a very
poor state of repair. Currently, the community interest company could only
occupy a small number of rooms due to the poor condition within the centre. The
rooms in occupation were primarily the main downstairs hall and a small number
of offices on the ground floor. The remaining majority of the property had
significant issues with water ingress, damp, lack or reliable heating, broken
windows, roof leaks, plaster damage amongst other concerns.
A business plan had been submitted by The Other
Perspective outlining the initiatives to be delivered from the International
Centre, those were supported by the Council and planned to strengthen the
community development offer within the town. The initiatives included local
participation, and incorporated a series of projects through social enterprise
to support the development of employment opportunities, training and
enterprise. In order to successfully deliver the vision, the International
Centre was integral. It was therefore proposed that, rather than simply
regenerate, the Council transfer its freehold interest to allow the community
interest company to bid for funding to both regenerate and redevelop the asset
to meet the needs of the proposals put forward.
An Asset Disposal Business Case, confirming the
status of the subject property as surplus to operational Council requirements,
was attached as Appendix B.
OPTIONS
Re-use
for operational purposes
No
Council operational service requirement had been identified. The Council would
have required the asset for polling station purposes, however, it had been
agreed that fell within the remit of community benefit and the building would
be made available to the Council for that purpose.
Community
Asset Transfer on 25 year lease
That
remained a viable option, but not the desirable one. The Community Asset
transfer on a long-term lease would not have offered the same attraction to
external funders as the transfer of the freehold interest. Upon transfer of the
freehold interest the Council would place a covenant on the property which
would require that the asset may only be used for community use, which would
prevent any further re-sale or redevelopment for profit. In addition, there
would be a requirement that if funds were not secured within a three year
period for the regeneration of the asset the organisation would be required to
transfer it back to the Council.
Council
Complete Repairs and look to offer Commercial let or sale
The
Council would have needed to invest significant resources to bring the property
to a lettable standard. The cost schedule for the required repairs was a
minimum of £200k, which far exceeded the valuation of the asset. The Council
could have marketed the property for sale, however, it was within a prominent
part of town which offered significant value to the diverse local community.
The Council was committed to locality and place based working, and offering the
property on the open market in its current condition would not have fulfilled
that commitment to the local communities or make best use of the asset.
Do
nothing
The
property would have remained in its present state, and would have continued to
deteriorate. The Other Perspective could not have continued to occupy under
licence in the building due to its deteriorating condition.
ORDERED
That the
proposal to transfer the Council’s freehold interest to a community group - The
Other Perspective, who were currently occupying under license, be approved.
REASON
The
Centre’s size and facilities plus location provided an excellent opportunity for
a range of cultural and community activities for a diverse range of
stakeholders to improve health, wellbeing, learning and education.
Community
organisations could bid for external funds for asset regeneration to support
community activities, those had a higher rate of success if the organisation
had the freehold interest in the property. The Council and MVDA planned to
support the community organisation to bid for funding to regenerate the asset
within a prominent part of the town to deliver against its business plan.
The
proposal planned to ensure a community asset, which was currently underused,
was brought back into use to support the local community. That would support
key objectives of external grant funding:
·
to save underused
community assets;
·
assist in developing
community organisations and community businesses;
·
empower local
communities; and
·
strengthen links at place based level - supporting locality working
objectives.
Supporting documents: