Jane Hill, Strategic
Community Safety Manager will provide a presentation regarding community
triggers and how they can support victims of anti-social behavior.
A further
discussion with the officers from ASB help will follow surrounding how the
community trigger has helped in other areas.
Minutes:
Jane Hill, Strategic Community Safety Manager
for Middlesbrough Council followed with a
presentation in relation to community triggers. She started by reassuring the
panel that Middlesbrough Council have an excellent
team and victims of crime and asb are their upmost
concern and we out them at the forefront of what the council do.
In terms of community triggers, as way of
introduction:
•
The Community Trigger was introduced under the
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.
•
Purpose - To give victims and communities the right
to request a review of their case and bring agencies together to take a joined
up, problem solving approach to find a solution.
•
Vulnerable or repeat victims of ASB being missed
due to agencies working in isolation (Fiona Pilkington case)
•
Information regarding problems in an area not being
shared between agencies
•
Poor coordination of problems and lack of problem
solving or joint working between agencies
The following agencies are involved in the
community trigger:
•
Middlesbrough Council
•
Cleveland Police
•
Tees Valley Commissioning Group (CCG) if required
•
Co-opted Housing Associations (Thirteen lead
contact)
The community can ask for the community trigger
to be activated when it hits the following thresholds:
•
An
individual, business or community group has
made three or more reports regarding the same problem in the past
six months to Middlesbrough Council, Cleveland
Police, or their Housing Association Landlord, or
•
More than
one individual, business or community group has
made five or more reports about the same problem in the past six
months to Middlesbrough Council, Cleveland Police, or
their Housing Association Landlord.
The request for the community trigger to be
activated when:
Qualifying requests:
•
Requests cannot be made more than 6 months after
the problems to review have occurred.
•
Requests cannot be made where the problems were not
reported to official agencies within 1 month of their occurrence.
•
Generally requests cannot be made about problems
that occurred outside of Middlesbrough.
•
The Community Trigger process is a request for a review.
It is not a complaint process.
The trigger process in Middlesbrough:
•
All requests must be made by telephone, email or
letter to the Council’s Neighbourhood Safety Team.
•
Acknowledgement letter sent.
•
Information request made to all ‘responsible’
agencies
•
Legal Services decide if threshold met
•
Case Review Panel meeting arranged
•
Applicant informed of outcome
The community trigger process would be
circulated to the members after the meeting. The Manager also acknowledge ASB
Helps comment regarding victims and their attendance at the case review
meetings. In the past Middlesbrough has not invited
victims, however following on from the meeting the procedures would be updated
and all victims would be invited in the future.
The Manager made reference to the comment made
by a panel member with respect to not being aware of the community trigger, and
the Manager felt that more work was required to promoting the community
trigger, this has been done in the past, however clearly needs reviewing.
The Manager outlined that the information on the
Middlesbrough Council website did not provide full
details of the Trigger and this has therefore been reviewed and new information
will be uploaded as soon as possible by ICT.
Middlesbrough Council also share good practice
and the Manager made reference to Redcar and
Cleveland who would be reviewing their process and proforma.
If the thresholds are met, the review panel will
consider the following:
1. Have
the reports been acknowledged?
2. Was
the victims vulnerability assessed? The Manager outlined that she carried out
some work with the Home Office to produce a matrix for Victims of anti-social
behaviour which was rolled out nationally.
3. Did
any response consider the vulnerability of the victim?
4. Was
there appropriate information sharing / problem solving / joint working?
5. Were
procedures followed?
6. Was
the victims vulnerability reduced to a satisfactory level?
7. Was
the problem reduced to a level where the
behaviour reported is no longer a cause for concern?
8. Case
review panel may make recommendations and/or produce an action plan
In
terms of numbers of Community Triggers:
Community Triggers by Quarter – Financial Year 2021/22 |
||||||
Quarter |
Total |
Date Received |
Ward |
Met Threshold |
Appeals |
|
Q1
(Apr-Jun) |
2 |
Jun-21 |
North
Ormesby |
Y |
N |
|
Jun-21 |
Coulby Newham |
N |
N |
|||
Q2
(Jul-Sep) |
4 |
Jul-21 |
North
Ormesby |
N |
Y |
|
Jul-21 |
Park
End & Beckfield |
N |
N |
|||
Aug-21 |
Brambles
& Thorntree |
Y |
N |
|||
Sep-21 |
Hemlington |
N |
N |
|||
Q3
(Oct-Dec) |
4 |
Oct-21 |
Brambles
& Thorntree |
Y |
N |
|
Dec-21 |
Berwick
Hills & Pallister |
Y |
N |
|||
Dec-21 |
Berwick
Hills & Pallister |
Y |
N |
|||
Dec-21 |
Berwick
Hills & Pallister |
Y |
N |
|||
Q4
(Jan-Mar) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There had been 10 to date, however the Manager
outlined that in previous years there were few community triggers, however
after the all member briefing, requests were made and therefore it shows that
of you promote the trigger, they are requested.
The Manager outlined that Middlesbrough
work very hard with partners, however one aspect that they fail is reporting
back to the community e.g. need to report back on days of action.
Lastly the Manager provided some information on
the early inventions in Middlesbrough:
•
Active
Intelligence mapping (AIM) – multi agency problem solving approach (Chaired by
Geoff Field)
•
Operational
task & finish groups
•
Set up location individual perpetrator records
•
Preventative measures/liaison with other agencies
i.e. Police, Fire, Schools, Early Help, YOS, Social Care
•
Evidence gathering – Diary sheets, CCTV, warden
reports. We do struggle to gather evidence as many young people still wear
masks so it is difficult to identify the perpetrators.
•
Supporting victims (residents & businesses)
throughout process
•
Warning letters/home visits
•
Acceptable behaviour contracts
•
Joint patrols
•
Final warnings
•
Legal action (injunctions, house closures, Criminal
Behaviour Orders, PSPO etc)
The Head of Stronger communities further stated
that whilst the community trigger is a tool, there are also other tools (as
outlined above) to support the victims. The overwhelming amount of anti-scoail behavior issues which are reported to the Council,
we hope can we dealt with through the multi- agency approach.
The community trigger is a safety net and anyone
can raise a community trigger or on behalf of the victim (subject to consent)
and ASB Help outlined that the process of Middlesbrough
council looked very thorough and in terms of promoting the pledge they would be
happy to work with Middlesbrough.
The officers were thanked for their
presentation.
AGREED- That the information be noted.
Supporting documents: