The Partnership Manager will be in attendance to present the STSCP’s Annual Report 2021/22.
Minutes:
G
Watson, Partnership Manager – South Tees Safeguarding Children Partnership, was
in attendance at the meeting, accompanied by S Butcher, Executive Director of
Children’s Services, to provide the Panel with an overview of the local partnership
arrangements for safeguarding children, the work undertaken by the Partnership
and to highlight areas of significance within the 2021/22 Annual Report.
The
Panel was informed that the South Tees Safeguarding Children Partnership
(STSCP) was established in 2019 in response to changes to the multi-agency
safeguarding arrangements introduced in the Children and Social Work Act
2017. It succeeded the Middlesbrough
Local Safeguarding Children Board and the Redcar & Cleveland Safeguarding
Children Board (LSCBs). The STSCP was a formal partnership between the two
South Tees Local Authorities of Middlesbrough and Redcar and Cleveland,
Cleveland Police and North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board. The Partners had a shared ambition to improve
the lives of the most vulnerable children in their area, many of whom faced
multiple disadvantage.
Middlesbrough
Council was the host for the STSCP, as outlined in the legal agreement
establishing the Partnership. The STSCP
Executive was the key decision-making body and consisted of the Executive Leads
of the four statutory partners. During
the period covered by the annual report (1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022), the
arrangements included:-
·
Meetings with Key
Partners Chief Officers, chaired by the Chief Executive of Middlesbrough
Council.
·
Meetings at
Executive level to set the strategic direction for the Partnership.
·
Partnership
meetings attended by the executive leads of the four statutory partners and the
broader partnership, chaired by an Independent Chair.
·
Sub groups and
task and finish groups.
The
Panel was advised that representation on the STSCP’s Executive had been
extended to include the Directors of Education from Middlesbrough and Redcar
and Cleveland and work was ongoing to extend this further to include the
Director of Public Health for South Tees.
The
Working Together (to Safeguard Children) 2018 guidance described the features
of effective multi-agency safeguarding partnerships. Local arrangements must support and enable
local organisations and agencies to work together in a system placing the child
at the heart of the process and aimed to ensure:-
·
Children were
safeguarded and their welfare promoted.
·
Partner
organisations and agencies collaborated, shared and co-owned the vision for how
to achieve improved outcomes for vulnerable children.
·
Organisations and
agencies challenge appropriately and held one another to account effectively.
·
Early
identification and analysis of new safeguarding issues and emerging threats.
·
Learning was
promoted and embedded in a way that local services for children and families
could become more reflective and implement changes to practice, informing the
local approach to prevention.
·
Information was
shared effectively to facilitate more accurate and timely decision making for
children and families.
The
Panel was informed that the STSCP had four key priorities:-
·
VEMT (Vulnerable,
Exploited, Missing, Trafficked) - The
aim was for children and young people to be free from the risk and harm of exploitation,
going missing or being trafficked.
·
Neglect - The aim was to reduce neglect, reduce the impact of neglect and
ensure help and support was provided at the earliest opportunity.
·
Empowering Young People - The aim was to create a clear focus on the
needs and experience of young people.
·
Working Together - The aim was to achieve excellent partnership working
across all areas.
This
STSCP Annual Report highlighted key areas requiring focus during the year,
including:-
·
Criminal
Exploitation and Violence in Young People – The number of Vulnerable,
Exploited, Missing and Trafficked (VEMT) cases across South Tees had
increased. A number of multi-agency
development sessions had been held, supported by the Office of the Police and
Crime Commissioner. The Tees VEMT
Strategic Group sponsored a workshop to review processes and understanding of
VEMT issues across the Tees region that had led to a review of the Tees VEMT
Strategy and action plan.
·
Neglect - The
understanding of neglect and importance of prevention and early help had been
increased, with training available to professionals and staff working across
South Tees. The Tees Safeguarding
Procedures website was recognised by the inspectorate as a reliable and useful
source of information and was well accessed by a diverse variety of
people. The Tees Procedures Group had
reviewed and updated the ‘Neglect’ section on the website as a result of the recent
work undertaken.
·
Serious Case Reviews
– The number of serious incidents had peeked during lockdown, leading to a
backlog of serious case reviews. Good
progress had been made in reducing the backlog with no outstanding reviews. There were currently just two safeguarding
practice reviews ongoing.
·
In relation to
published serious case reviews, it was identified that “the risk of drug using
parents actively giving drugs to their children” should be covered in all
relevant multi-agency training. Public
Health had co-ordinated and delivered multi-agency training to include the
signs and symptoms in children of drug ingestion, and clarity about what
professionals should do if they suspected this was happening.
·
It was also
highlighted that criminal exploitation and neglect were major factors in the
serious incident cases. The STSCP was
working with the Cleveland Police Violence Reduction Unit in relation to
addressing criminal exploitation.
In
terms of moving forward, embedding the voice of the child in practice was
key. The Voice of the Child was now
part of all STSCP multi-agency audits and was reported back directly to partner
agencies. Work had been taking place in
schools to gather young people’s opinions on a range of issues including personal
safety and knife crime.
The
STSCP training programme reflected the safeguarding priorities, including
training around child sexual abuse, domestic abuse, neglect including
adolescent neglect, trauma-based practice and criminal exploitation. Training had been provided on-line during the
pandemic, however, it was planned to reintroduce face to face training as this
also provided networking opportunities for those attending. On-line, or
E-Learning, was accessible to professionals working in both adults and
children’s services as well as the voluntary and community sector. Learning from audits and reviews was
impacting on planning and service delivery by changing procedure and practice.
The
former Independent Chair of the STSCP’s Executive had now been appointed as a
Scrutineer and was in the process of undertaking a piece of focused work with a
report anticipated to be finalised by the end of November 2022. The Scrutineer would examine the Serious Case
Reviews that had been undertaken and identify learning from those reviews, in
addition to the Section 11 audit on safeguarding and also the progress being
made by all key partners. Once finalised
the report could be submitted to the Panel for information.
The
Executive Director of Children’s Services added that Middlesbrough worked well
with Redcar and Cleveland on many fronts and that the STSCP, which was once an
under-developed partnership, had really grown.
The previously large backlog of serious case reviews was now up to date. The Director wished to thank the Partnership
Manager and his colleague, A Fishwick, for their hard
work and recognised the challenges of being such a small business unit of just
two staff. There were currently two
vacancies within the unit, however, there had been difficulties in recruiting
to the posts. It was highlighted that
the Independent Chair reported to Middlesbrough’s Improvement Board on a
regular basis and felt confident that the STSCP was now in a much stronger
position to take over some of the work of the Improvement Board as it moved
away.
A
discussion ensued and the following issues were raised by the Panel:-
·
A Member of the
Panel expressed concern over the increase in criminal exploitation issues and
queried whether this was increasing nationally as well as locally. The Panel was advised that unfortunately it
was particularly prevalent in Middlesbrough in terms of criminal gang activity,
particularly involving young people. It
was more so an issue in Middlesbrough than in Redcar and Cleveland and other
local authority areas and it was something Middlesbrough was having to deal
with more and more. In addition, there
was a significant level of violence, particularly amongst young people, and the
use of weapons was very stark.
·
Reference was made
to recruitment and the Panel was informed that recruitment to posts within the
STSCP business unit had proved difficult.
One admin post that had been advertised across the North East region had
received just one application. Attempts
to fill the positions would continue and consideration would be given as to how
this could be done differently to attract applicants.
·
In terms of
recruitment of Social Workers within Children’s Services, it was highlighted
that the Improvement Adviser was paying particular attention to recruitment and
retention and holding Children’s Services to account to ensure that everything
possible was being done to attract and retain staff. Even a 15% market supplement on top of a
post’s salary could not guarantee it would be successful. Recruitment and retention was also being
closely scrutinised by the Improvement Board and that would continue once the
Board moved away. Recruitment was
challenging for other local authorities and also for other professions within
the local authority. It was a particular
challenge within the north east and some London boroughs.
·
In response to a
query regarding take up of training provided by the STSCP, the Panel heard that
training was moving towards face to face provision once again, although e-learning
would still be available. It was noted
that training take up had dipped during the pandemic and whilst it had
increased it still remained at half the level it was in 2012. The Panel was advised that additional courses
were being developed and more ‘event style’ training was planned to increase
take up.
·
In terms of who
the training was aimed at, the Panel was informed that the courses were aimed
at professionals across all social care sectors, Police, education and schools.
·
It was queried
whether the STSCP knew whether the training it provided was being put into
practice. The Practice Manager stated
that they were looking into introducing a measure that would examine the impact
of the training. Online training
provided a good opportunity to collect this information. There were currently 26 courses available for
access on the Tees-wide E-learning website.
The Partnership Manager stated that they were also looking into the
possibility of recording events to use as an online training tool.
·
A Panel Member
expressed concern in relation to the issues of exploitation and trafficking and
provided examples within her own ward of young people becoming involved in
gangs, and queried whether the STSCP had good engagement with the Police. The Partnership Manager advised that the
STSCP was involved in Police exploitation groups and that the Police chaired
some of the STSCP’s sub groups.
·
In response to a
query regarding the prosecution of trafficking perpetrators, it was explained
that it was very challenging for the Police as young people were reluctant to
provide names of perpetrators or those also involved in gangs or to give
evidence, as they were often afraid of retribution. Several groups involving Police had focussed
on this work and were very much part of the safeguarding partnership. This included the Exploitation Group and the
Risk Management Group. The Police were
working hard to try to disrupt the criminal gangs by targeting gang leaders who
were carrying out the exploitation and recognised that many of the young people
involved were victims themselves.
·
It was queried
how much work was being done in relation to listening to the Voice of the
Child. The Partnership Manager provided
an example of a recent event held at the Riverside Stadium in relation to knife
crime, involving young people from 19 schools in Middlesbrough and 15 schools
in Redcar in Cleveland taking part in a drama presentation. During the question and answer session that
formed part of the event, young people’s views had been gathered and it came
through strongly that they felt once young people engaged in crime, they did
not engage with professionals.
·
It was queried
whether the STSCP had noted a significant impact on communities due to Covid and the cost of living crisis. The Partnership
Manager advised that during the pandemic there had been a significant number of
serious cases reviews, with ten ongoing at one point. It was considered that Covid
had impacted on those cases in some way, for example, children were not being
seen as regularly as they had been and/or families were not able to access the
services they needed.
·
The Panel noted
that a number of the serious case reviews related to children ingesting drugs
and it was asked whether this was something that had been or would be covered
as part of the training courses available.
The Partnership Manager confirmed that issues identified in the learning
from the serious case reviews were fed into training development. There appeared to be a problem in
Middlesbrough with children ingesting methadone, this had resulted in one child
death and one near death. It was
highlighted that the serious case reviews had to be reported to a national
panel which held the STSCP to account as well as providing national learning.
·
In relation to a
question regarding timescales for reporting to the Safeguarding Board, it was
stated that learning reviews were required to be submitted to the National
Panel and were published on the NSPCC website.
Unless there was a significant reason why not, they must be published,
but were anonymised. When a serious
incident was referred in, for example, a baby being left at home alone, a Rapid
Review meeting was held internally to look at the severity of the case. If it was deemed to be serious it would be
presented to the Panel.
·
The STSCP
Executive met every other month and was looking to broaden its membership to
relevant partners such as the voluntary sector.
·
It was queried
whether the STSCP held dialogue with the Stockton and Hartlepool safeguarding
boards. It was confirmed that the STSCP
worked closely with them and shared learning with them and this was seen as a
positive way forward to share work across the tees area in a similar way that
the Adult Safeguarding Board worked across the Tees area.
·
In response to a
question as to whether sufficient support was received from central government,
the Panel was advised that a North East round table discussion and a National
round table discussion was taking place in relation to support development. Resources had an impact on everything so it
was crucial to ensure as much partnership working as possible across
everything.
The
Chair thanked the Officers for their attendance and information provided arising
from the very informative Annual Report of the STSCP.
AGREED that the STSCP Annual Report for 2021/22 be noted.
Supporting documents: