Following Ofsted’s recent inspection, the Scrutiny Panel will receive the Trust's response to Ofsted’s findings, which contains actions planned to secure improvements.
Minutes:
Following a recent inspection, Outwood Academy
Ormesby had been judged inadequate by Ofsted. The Trust’s response to Ofsted’s
findings had been circulated with the agenda pack for the meeting and the
response outlined actions planned to improve the academy’s performance.
The Director of Education and Partnerships
advised that when an academy was judged as inadequate, it was standard
procedure that the DfE would write to the academy providing a warning that the
academy’s funding agreement could be terminated. The document circulated with
the agenda pack was the Academy Trust’s response to that letter, which stated
that the Trust’s preferred option was to bring about the rapid change needed to
remove the academy from its inadequate judgement. It was commented that the
Trust had conveyed a preference to submit written evidence to today’s meeting,
to illustrate the improvement work that was planned, rather than provide a
verbal report.
It was explained that Outwood Academy Ormesby
was working closely with the Local Authority and the DfE to improve the
academy’s performance. It was added that the Council’s Head of Achievement had
been appointed as a member of the Academy Improvement Board.
Members queried whether the school would
subsidise the Local Authority for the support it was receiving from officers.
The Director of Education and Partnerships advised that the Local Authority was
unable to charge for the services and support provided. The Strategic Lead for
Inclusion and Specialist Support Service advised, however, that given the high
levels of permanent exclusions, the Local Authority had approached the School Management
Forum to request additional funding. Subsequently, the forum had agreed to
transfer £600,000 from schools to the High Needs Budget to enable the effective
delivery of support to those pupils who were at risk of exclusion. In response
to a Member’s query, it was explained that the all schools had contributed an
equal amount to the High Needs Budget, regardless of their exclusion rates.
A Member made reference to the two parents
meetings, which had been held by the Trust, to present the Ofsted inspection
outcome and discuss the Action Plan. The
Member challenged the comment made by the Trust in the submitted letter, which
stated that positive responses had been received. The Member had attended one
of those meetings and conveyed that positive feedback had not been received
from parents.
The Head of Access to Education and Alternative
Provision advised that as Outwood Academy Ormesby had been judged as
inadequate, a HMI Inspector would now be attached to the academy to monitor
performance. The academy would also be subject to a series of Ofsted monitoring
visits, whereby the academy would be required to demonstrate/illustrate that
significant improvements had been made to the academy’s standards and
performance.
A Member commented that the academy had been
visited by several Members during the last academic year and staff members and
pupils had been polite and respectful. Therefore, the Ofsted judgement was
somewhat unexpected. It was commented that the way in which the Ofsted report
had been written was particularly challenging.
In terms of sanctions, a discussion ensued and
Members expressed concern in respect of the high levels of permanent exclusions
and suspensions.
A Member commented that it would be beneficial
to receive further information and updates on the academy’s improvement
journey.
As it had been reported that the school
community had suffered from a significant amount of Covid-19 related deaths, a
Member raised a query in respect of the support provided to those pupils who
had suffered bereavements. The Strategic Lead for Inclusion and Specialist
Support Service commented that bereavement support had been delivered by the
Educational Psychology Service.
That the
information presented to the scrutiny panel be noted and further updates be
presented in due course.
Supporting documents: