Minutes:
A report of the Interim Director
of Finance was presented, the purpose of which was to:
• Advise
the Members of the Teesside Pension Board (the Board) of an ongoing government consultation: “Local
Government Pension Scheme (England and
Wales): Next steps on investments” which set out a proposed direction of travel in relation to
investment pooling on the Local Government Pension
Scheme (LGPS).
• Explain
the process being followed in relation to the Pension Fund and Border to Coast Pensions Partnership (‘Border to
Coast’) responding to the consultation.
• Outline
the main points the Pension Fund was likely to make in response to the consultation.
Border to Coast, together with
its Partner Funds, had been working to develop a joint response to the
consultation, which was being drafted at the time of writing this report. Alongside this joint response, which it was
expected all Partner Funds would be able to sign up to, each Partner Fund would
also be submitting a response to government.
These individual responses might emphasise particular
aspects or cover areas of special concern to each Fund but were not
expected to contradict the general collective approach being developed by all
the pool participants. A response from
the Teesside Fund would be presented to the Pension Fund Committee on 27
September for comments and approval.
Much of what the Government was
proposing was in line with the approach to pooling that had already been
adopted by Border to Coast and its Partner Funds.
Questions from the consultation
together with some summary comments on collective response that was likely to
be given from Border to Coast and its Partner Funds were set out at paragraph
5.3 of the submitted report.
Areas the Teesside Fund was
likely to emphasise in its own response to the consultation included:
• Re-iterating
resistance to the Government’s continuing attempts to direct Funds as to how to
allocate their assets. The 2015 consultation started with a drive to use LGPS
Funds to pay for UK infrastructure projects, the latest iteration looks to
leverage LGPS assets to help pay for the Government’s ‘levelling-up’ agenda.
• Caution
around the drive to invest in private assets – although private market
performance had been very good over recent years, past performance was no
guarantee of future outcomes, and with an era of ‘cheap money’ seemingly coming
to an end there was a risk Funds could be directed inappropriately into
illiquid investments that might not deliver expected outcomes.
• The
consultation suggested the ‘deadline’ for the transfer of non-listed assets
into Funds could easily be 31 March 2025 as well. In fact, there were
significant barriers associated with transferring these assets. One in particular the Government could alleviate, would be to
allow the transfer of property assets from a Fund to a Pool without incurring
stamp duty.
The consultation period would end on 2 October 2023. The expectation was that the Government might either announce the outcome of the consultation or give a strong steer as to its likely announcement in the Autumn Statement (expected to be in November). The Board would be kept up to date with future developments on the guidance and/or regulations relating to LGPS investment pooling.
A Board Member commented that the
Fund’s assets should not be used to implement central government policy
objectives and suggested that this view should be worded as strongly as
possible in Teesside’s consultation response.
AGREED that the information provided was received and noted.
Supporting documents: