Venue: Council Chamber
Contact: Susan Lightwing
Welcome and Evacuation Procedure
The Chair welcomed all present to the meeting and read out the Building Evacuation Procedure.
Declarations of Interest
any declarations of interest.
The minutes of the Corporate Affairs meeting held on 9 June 2022 were submitted and approved as a correct record.
The Annual Report of the Head of Internal Audit and the
Annual Counter Fraud Report were presented to the Committee.
The purpose of the Annual Report was to provide Members with a summary of internal audit work undertaken in 2021/22 and provide an opinion on the overall adequacy and effectiveness of the Council’s framework of governance, risk management and internal control. An annual report setting out counter fraud activity and performance was also included.
The annual report was attached the Appendix 1 to the submitted report. It included a summary of findings from recently finalised audit work as well as the status of agreed audit actions.
The Auditor commented that in some cases progress had not been made within agreed timescales and where appropriate the target implementation date for those actions was extended. Where targets were six months beyond the deadline, detailed reasons were provided in the submitted report.
The report also included details of Veritau’s Quality Assurance and Improvement Programme (QAIP). This included ongoing quality assurance arrangements and activities, annual self-assessment, external assessments at least once every five years, as well as an annual survey of senior management in each client organisation.
Veritau also provided a counter fraud service to the Council. An annual report setting out counter fraud activity and performance was attached as Appendix 2 to the submitted report.
In relation to further audit work on a number of allegations made by former Executive Members, the Auditor was asked whether that work had been concluded. The Auditor confirmed that the audit field work was complete and the draft report was currently with management. It was possible that further work might be required. Once management had agreed the report it would be presented to the Corporate Affairs and Audit Committee, unless there was any referral to Standards Committee, which would take priority.
In light of weaknesses in governance arrangements identified recently by the External Auditors, the Chair asked how the Internal Auditor had provided an opinion of substantial assurance in relation to a report on an audit of Governance Arrangements published in September 2021. The Internal Auditor explained that on the scope of the work undertaken for that particular audit, he was happy to provide an opinion of substantial assurance. There were areas where the Council did need to improve but there was no conflict in being able to give substantial assurance to one audit, whilst also addressing those other areas where he was not able to give substantial assurance.
AGREED as follows that the:
of internal audit work and counter fraud work undertaken was received and
of the Head of Internal Audit on the adequacy and effectiveness of the Council’s framework of
governance, risk management and internal control was noted.
control issues identified by internal audit which were considered relevant to
the preparation of the Council’s Annual Governance Statement were noted.
4. outcome of the Quality Assurance and Improvement Programme and the confirmation that the internal audit service conformed with ... view the full minutes text for item 22/10
The draft Audit Results Report for the Year Ended 31 March 2021 was presented for the Committee’s consideration.
The audit was designed to express an opinion on the 2020/21 financial statements and address current statutory and regulatory requirements.
The report contained the External Auditors’ findings related to the areas of audit emphasis, views on Middlesbrough Council’s accounting policies and judgements and material internal control findings. The report also included conclusions on the arrangements of Middlesbrough Council to secure value for money in its use of resources.
The Audit Planning Report presented at the 23 July 2021 Corporate Affairs and Audit Committee meeting provided an overview of the audit scope and approach for the audit of the financial statements. The audit had been carried out in accordance with this plan, with the following exceptions:
• Changes in materiality: EY revisited the planning materiality assessment using the draft Statement of Accounts. Based on the materiality measure of gross expenditure on provision of services, the overall materiality assessment was updated to £8.2 million (£7.9 million in the Audit Planning Report). This resulted in updated performance materiality at 75% of overall materiality of £6.1 million (£5.9 million in the Audit Planning Report). The threshold for reporting misstatements of £0.4 million remained as reported in our Audit Planning Report.
• Value for Money: in the Audit Planning Report, one risk of significant
weakness was identified in the Council’s arrangements to secure value for money through economic, efficient and effective use of its resources during 2020/21 relating to the provision of Children’s Services. During the course of the audit, a second risk of significant weakness in the Council’s arrangements in respect of Member and senior officer relationships was identified.
EY’s audit work in respect of the Council was substantially complete. The following items relating to the completion of audit procedures were outstanding:
• The Council had not yet produced an Annual Governance Statement that all signatories were comfortable signing. Further revisions to the Annual Governance Statement were expected to fully articulate the risks of non-delivery of improvements and it would need to be reviewed by EY once it was agreed.
• Further guidance was awaited from CIPFA on modifications to the CIPFA/LASAAC Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the United Kingdom 2020/21 which was expected to introduce changes to the required presentation of infrastructure assets within the financial statements which management would need to action.
• Management signature of the Letter of Representation at the same time as the financial statements.
• Performance of final audit procedures, including a review for subsequent events which might impact or require disclosure within the financial statements, up to the date of the audit report.
Given that the audit process was still ongoing, EY would continue to challenge the remaining evidence provided and the final disclosures in the Statement of Accounts which could influence the final audit opinion, a current draft of which was provided in section 3 of the submitted report and confirmed that the financial statements: ... view the full minutes text for item 22/11
The Chief Executive presented a report that summarised the impact of the serious and pervasive governance and cultural concerns that had been articulated by EY, the External Auditors, on the finalisation of the 2020/21 Annual Governance Statement (AGS) and the planned way forward.
Having considered the evidence base, the statutory Chief Officers were in agreement with the EY judgement and were also in agreement with the actions that were required to deal with those concerns.
As part of steps to ensure full understanding of the issues identified and the change required, significant correspondence and discussion had taken place between the three statutory Chief Officers, the Elected Mayor and Deputy Mayor, the Chair of Corporate Affairs and Audit Committee and Ernst Young.
The improvement required would only be achieved through a very rapid and widespread change in the political culture of the Council and a fundamental change in the way that Elected Members behaved. Following careful consideration of discussions that had taken place and other evidence available to them outside of the audit period, it was the view of the Head of Paid Service and the Section 151 Officer that there were significant risks that must be acknowledged and addressed fully, in order to afford the best opportunity for improvement.
In summary these related to:
• The sheer size and scale of cultural change required. Wholescale understanding of the concerns raised; full acceptance of them; an acknowledgement of the individual and collective contribution to failings and a demonstrable willingness to change behaviour was not yet evident.
• a belief that since April 2021 relationships between Elected Members and officers had deteriorated further and that as a result there now existed a more pervasive culture than that evidenced in 2020/21.
The Head of Paid Service and the Section 151 Officer were unable sign the AGS as was required, until such time that these risks were fully acknowledged and reflected within the document.
The Head of Paid Service and Section 151 Officer were intent on securing the required revisions and having the Statement agreed and signed by the relevant parties, as soon as these points could be properly documented and agreed by all signatories.
Members were advised that the 2021/22 Annual Governance Statement (AGS), due to be published in draft form once the 2020/21 AGS had been finalised, would confirm that these issues continued to exist. The report at Agenda Item 11 entitled ‘Commencing a Corporate Governance Improvement Journey’ set out in more detail the planned actions to engage all stakeholders further, develop a consensus of opinion on the fundamental issues and development of a way forward.
Committee Members and other Councillors present at the meeting were given the opportunity to ask questions, to which the Head of Paid Service and Section 151 Officer responded.
AGREED that the current position was noted and the planned approach to address the issues outlined was supported by the Corporate Affairs and Audit Committee.
In accordance with Council Procedure Rule No 61 – Motions without Notice – ... view the full minutes text for item 22/12
A copy of the External Auditors’ Letter of Representation
was presented in relation to the Statement of Accounts for the Year Ending 31
AGREED that the letter was approved and signed by the Chair of the Corporate Affairs and Audit Committee and the Director of Finance.
A report of the Director of Finance (Section 151 Officer) was presented, the purpose of which was for Members to approve the Council’s Statement of Accounts for the 2020/21 financial year following completion of the external audit process and in line with statutory requirements.
Given the various issues on Governance presented in the External Auditors’ Audit Results Report as part of their value for money assessment, and that an update from CIPFA (Chartered Institute of Public Finance & Accountancy) on their consultation on highways infrastructure assets was awaited, the approval would be in principle at this stage. A number of subsequent actions would be required to close the approval/external audit process around the accounts.
The draft Statement of Accounts for 2020/21 was presented to the Corporate Affairs and Audit Committee on 5 August 2021 to provide Members with an understanding of the Council’s financial position, performance and cash flows at 31 March 2021 and how it had performed against it revenue and capital budget plans. Significant issues included within the financial statements were also discussed for information at that stage.
Details of the changes to the Statement of Accounts, including the unadjusted items, and further information in relation to Highways Assets were contained in the submitted report.
Further updates had been provided to the Committee on progress during the audit, principally on the 31March and 9 June 2022. The various delays experienced on the audit of the accounts and why statutory date had not been met had been clarified. In order to complete the process an audit opinion was required from the External Auditor (EY) in relation to both a true and fair view on the financial statements presented and the value for money arrangements put in place by the Council.
The 2020/21 audit had been a significant undertaking for many local authorities. CIPFA reported that at the statutory date for these accounts of 30 September 2021 only 9% of English Local Authorities had completed their external audit. Although this had improved to 40% by 31 January 2022, it illustrated the scale of challenge for Councils.
In addition, new regulations had been introduced on local audit firms following a number of high profile corporate failures in 2018/19 which were influenced by inaccurate financial reporting. This had resulted in more emphasis on the concept of a Local Authority as a going concern and additional assurances and evidence being sought by auditors as part of their review of the Statement of Accounts.
AGREED that the Audited Statement of Accounts for 2020/21, as
attached at Appendix A to the submitted report, was approved on the following
1. the audit was substantially complete for both the financial statements and value for money assessment;
2. all relevant and appropriate adjustments had been made in the accounts as a result of the external audit process;
3. the list of unadjusted misstatements set out at paragraph 10 were not made within the accounts;
4. responsibility was delegated to the Interim Director of Finance (S151 Officer) to make ... view the full minutes text for item 22/14
A joint report of the Director of
Legal and Governance Services and Director of Finance (Section 151 Officer) was
presented to set out the outcome of an exercise to ensure the Council took the opportunity
to learn lessons from corporate governance issues that had occurred in other
The report identified actions to strengthen Middlesbrough Council’s
corporate governance arrangements
and set them out within the body of the report.
The findings in
the report were reflective of the governance concerns identified within the
draft Annual Governance Statement 2020/21 and the External Auditor’s Value for Money judgement
for the same period.
AGREED that the following items were noted:
outcome of lessons to be learned from other organisations and the planned responses.
made in relation to planned actions that were identified in response to the
previous lessons learned report on government intervention at Liverpool City Council.
3. crossover between issues identified in this report and the draft Annual Governance Statement 2020/21, the External Auditors Value for Money judgement 2020/21 and the report to commence the Corporate Governance improvement journey.
A joint report of the Chief
Executive, Director of Legal and Governance Services and the Director of
Finance was presented that set out how the Council intended to respond to the various
corporate governance concerns that had been presented to the Corporate Affairs
and Audit Committee.
The report summarised the ongoing work that had been undertaken to identify weaknesses within the Council’s Corporate Governance framework, outlined the consequences of those ongoing weaknesses as well as the planned next steps.
The Council would commission the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) to complete an independent assessment of the issues identified to date, as well as undertaking a detailed engagement exercise with all stakeholders to consider whether there were other issues still to be identified and make recommendations on the proposed way forward.
In order to
ensure that there was a broad consensus around the steps that need to be taken,
CIPFA would complete a short piece of work to engage with Members from across
the political spectrum, officers and other stakeholders. This work would be completed over six weeks
and look to identify:
CIPFA would be
uniquely placed to provide rapid, expert views on the effectiveness of current
systems, policies and processes. The
organisation was also currently providing support in a number of Councils that
had been subject to government intervention and would therefore bring
significant expertise to the table on what effective improvement and cultural
change looked like.
proposed response had not been developed in isolation. The Chair and Vice-Chair of the Corporate
Affairs and Audit Committee, the Mayor, Executive Member for Finance and
Governance, Chief Executive, Monitoring Officer and the Section 151 Officer had
all been engaged on this matter. The
three Statutory Chief Officers had jointly led the development of the proposed
A timetable had
been put in place to ensure a rapid conclusion to this exercise so that the
Full Council could collectively input into the process to identify the issues,
while also enabling it to quickly move into delivery, in order to demonstrate a
good pace of progress. Findings from the
CIPFA work and a proposed action plan would be presented to Full Council for
consideration. This would also set out
the planned governance and reporting arrangements for the subsequent improvement
plan to ensure all Members had the opportunity to comment and contribute.
A Member voiced concern about the timetable in light of the forthcoming local elections in May 2023. The Chief Executive commented that the first six weeks’ work would be critical to understand where there was, and was not, agreement on the issues. Irrespective of the political or officer make-up of the Council, the tone and plan for improvements ... view the full minutes text for item 22/16
A report of the Returning Officer and Electoral Registration Officer was presented to seek the Committee’s views and approval for the initial recommendations, following the first stage of the public consultation exercise and approve an amendment to the Community Governance Review timetable.
The Corporate Affairs and Audit Committee had delegated authority to agree the Community Governance Review Terms of Reference; to consider representations made; and to approve initial recommendations from the first stage of the public consultation.
Full Council would consider and approve the final recommendations after both consultations had taken place.
The report provided the Committee with the details of the processes undertaken and results of the first consultation, which included a Town-wide survey, a letter to a number of interested parties, a social media campaign and posters in community buildings.
Since agreeing the review timetable, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England had advised (April 2022) that any local authorities seeking change should submit their requests by 1 October 2022, to allow sufficient time for administrative and financial purposes (such as setting up the parish council and arranging its first precept).
The order should take effect on the 1 April following the date on which it is made. Electoral arrangements for a new or existing parish council would come into force at the first elections to the parish council following the reorganisation order. If the order was submitted by 1 October 2022, it would allow preparations for the conduct of those elections to be made. Therefore the Committee was asked to agree to a revised time-table for final approval.
Following a request, the Committee agreed to amend recommendation 3 c), to propose that the public were consulted on the number of Nunthorpe Parish Councillors being reduced to either 9 or 7 Councillors, rather than solely 9 as stated in the report.
AGREED that the Committee agree the draft recommendations for further public consultation as follows that:
1. The Stainton and Thornton Parish Council boundary was retained and unaltered.
2. The number of Parish Councillors to be elected for Stainton increased to 9 to cater for the large increase in the electorate.
3. Nunthorpe Parish Council was retained with the following proposed changes:
a) the Parish Council boundary for Nunthorpe Parish Council was extended to be co terminus with the Nunthorpe Electoral Ward Boundary to include:
1-29 Yew Tree Grove, TS7 8QX, 1-16 Milan Grove, TS7 0DQ (subject to a further consultation with those residents).
b) That the Principal Council electoral ward boundaries for Nunthorpe Ward were amended to include 12-16 Milan Grove and the Brethrens area.
c) That the number of Nunthorpe Parish Councillors be reduced to 9 OR 7 to mirror that of Stainton & Thornton Parish Council to ensure that electors had an equal voice within both communities.
4. A further detailed review of community councils by the Stronger Communities Team was undertaken, to consider how the Council engaged with community groups and assessed what support was required/available.
5. Delegated authority was granted to the Chief Executive ... view the full minutes text for item 22/17
Any other urgent items which in the opinion of the Chair, may be considered
Panel Members paid tribute to Ian Wright, Director of Finance, who would be leaving the Authority in July 2022. The Chair thanked Ian on behalf of the Panel for all his hard work and wished him well for the future.