Venue: Mandela Room
Contact: Scott Bonner
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Declarations of Interest To receive
any declaration of interests. Minutes: There were
no declarations of interest received at this point in the meeting. |
|
|
Minutes - Executive - 21 January 2026 To receive the minutes of the previous meeting. Minutes: The minutes of the Executive meeting held on 21 January 2026 were submitted and approved as a correct record. |
|
|
Announcements from the Mayor To receive any announcements from the Mayor. Minutes: None. |
|
|
Questions from Members of the Public (if any) To receive questions from members of the public. Minutes: None. |
|
|
Questions from elected Members (if any) To receive questions from elected Members. Minutes: None. |
|
|
Matters referred from Scrutiny or Council (if any) To consider reports of Overview and Scrutiny Board
following the Call-In process or Council following the Budget setting process. Minutes: None. |
|
|
Reports from the Overview and Scrutiny Board or a Scrutiny Panel (if any) To receive any reports from the Overview and Scrutiny
Board or Scrutiny Panels. Minutes: None. |
|
|
Reports from Member Bodies which are the responsibilities of the Executive To receive any reports from member bodies which are the responsibility
of the Executive. Minutes: None. |
|
|
Neighbourhood Hubs Investment Report for decision. Decision: ORDERED that Executive: a. Approves
the specification of works outlined for the enhancement of the North, South,
East and West Neighbourhood Hubs; b. Approves
that any of the £5m resource allocation which is not used on the redevelopment
of the Neighbourhood Hubs, be vired towards
neighbourhood assets and open spaces; and, c. Delegates
any construction contract, design, scope and budget adjustments to the Director
of Regeneration, in consultation with the Director of Environment and Community
Services – insofar as they are compliant with financial and contract procedure
rules. AGREED that Executive:
Minutes: In accordance with Council Procedure Rules 4.8.25 the
Chair proposed a motion without notice, which was seconded and agreed, to change
the order of business. The motion proposed that Agenda Item 15 to be heard
next. It was agreed that the order of business for the
remainder of the meeting be items 10,11,12,13,14,16. The Executive Members for Development and Neighbourhoods submitted a joint report for Executive consideration, seeking approval for significant investment in Middlesbrough’s Neighbourhood Hubs. The report outlined the planned enhancement of the North, South, East and West Neighbourhood Hubs, which form a key part of the Council’s Neighbourhood Working approach approved in April 2025. The Hubs are located in Hemlington (South), Newport (North), Berwick Hills (East) and Grove Hill (West) wards, each serving as a central base for community delivery within their areas. It was highlighted that £5 million of Transformation Programme capital funding had been allocated to support the upgrade of the hubs and selected community spaces, with the intention of improving access to services, strengthening community resilience and enabling a broader range of local activities. Members were advised that the investment would allow more staff and partner organisations to be based within neighbourhoods, offering tailored support specific to local needs. The proposed works included building adaptations to ensure the hubs are accessible, fit‑for‑purpose, and able to accommodate multiple uses. The report also set out the proposed phasing of works to maintain service continuity and the governance arrangements for managing project design, scope, and budget adjustments. Members noted that the hubs would play a key role in delivering Neighbourhood Working, which had been approved by the Executive in April 2025. Members were advised that the reference to approval in 2026 within the Executive Summary was an administrative error. Members raised concerns regarding the condition and accessibility of the existing neighbourhood facilities and discussed that neighbourhood staff had been required to work in poor conditions following their relocation from office accommodation, and that residents were unable to access buildings they believed should be open. Members also highlighted inconsistencies across the hubs, with some offering public access and others not, and commented on the terminology used for “community hubs” and “neighbourhoods’ hubs” It was noted that further work would be undertaken to address the naming issue. Following the recent management structure changes, it was identified that the titles of Directors referenced in the recommendations were incorrect, and it was suggested that the wording be amended to state that the Executive would delegate any construction contract, design, scope and budget adjustments to the Director responsible for Regeneration, in consultation with the Director responsible for Environment and Community Services, insofar as these were compliant with financial and contract procedure rules. OPTIONS A range of options and requirements had been considered
with the occupant services and Neighbourhood Managers. The service had informed
the scope and requirements of the specifications set out. ORDERED that Executive: a. Approves the specification of works outlined for the enhancement of the North, South, East and ... view the full minutes text for item 25/101 |
|
|
Revenue and Capital Budget – Forecast Year-end Outturn position at Quarter Three 2025/26 Report for decision. Additional documents:
Decision: ORDERED that Executive:
AGREED that Executive:
Minutes: The Executive Member for Finance submitted a report for
Executive consideration presenting the Council’s forecasted financial position
at Quarter Three 2025/26 and seeking approval for several required financial
actions. Members were informed that the projected year‑end
revenue budget pressure stood at £7.719 million before mitigations, and that
the proposed use of £6.044 million in central contingencies and other budgets
would reduce this to a net pressure of £1.675 million (1.1%), representing a
slight improvement from the Quarter Two position. The report outlined continued budget pressures within key
service areas, most significantly in Children’s Care, Adult Social Care,
Environment and Community Services, and Strategic Commercial Properties, and
noted that £7.675 million of required savings were forecast as undeliverable in
2025/26. Directors had therefore submitted financial recovery plans, supported
by ongoing corporate spending controls, in an effort to stabilise the year‑end
position. In relation to capital activity, Members were advised that
the report sought approval for a series of revenue and capital virements over
£250,000 and the inclusion of £0.357 million of new and expanded externally
funded schemes, increasing the revised Capital Programme for 2025/26 to £88.451
million. The projected capital outturn was reported as £64.173 million,
reflecting £23.300 million of slippage to future years and £0.978 million of
identified underspends. The report also provided updates on the latest forecast for
reserves, including expected usable unrestricted revenue reserves of £25.937
million at year‑end, the Dedicated Schools Grant position, which showed a
forecast cumulative deficit of £31.213 million by 31 March 2026, and the
Council’s borrowing, prudential indicators, and debt‑recovery
performance. Members were further informed of actions already implemented
and those planned to address identified pressures, including strengthened
financial controls, ongoing review of savings delivery, and continued
monitoring of expenditure, reserves and cashflow. Members noted that the graph on page 21 demonstrated that,
despite the forecast overspend, the Council’s reserves were still expected to
increase by year end compared with the position at the start of the financial
year. Members acknowledged areas of improvement and noted that,
when viewed in the context of the wider Budget, several actions being taken to
manage service demand were expected to contribute to reducing overspends over
time. Reference was made to the recent decision on school
catering, which would result in additional costs, and Members emphasised the
importance of ensuring such impacts were reflected and built into future
budgets. It was considered helpful to set out clearly why service
demand levels were being reset and how this supported efforts to address
budgetary pressures. In relation to crematorium income, Members noted that if
income targets could not realistically be achieved, it was appropriate to
adjust the budget accordingly. Members also stressed that underspends within
service areas should not be absorbed into future budgets, as services were
expected to manage within their allocated resources rather than rely on
historic overspends. OPTIONS The alternative would be to not approve the revenue budget virements over £250,000 and the changes to the Council’s capital programme, and to not ... view the full minutes text for item 25/102 |
|
|
2026/27 Revenue Budget, Medium Term Finance Plan, and Council Tax Setting Report for decision and submission to Council. Additional documents:
Decision: ORDERED the Executive to approve that the following are
forwarded to Council for approval:
AGREED the Executive:
Minutes: The Executive Member for Finance submitted a report for Executive consideration which set out the proposed 2026/27 Revenue Budget, Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP), and Council Tax proposals following the publication of the Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement. The report outlined key financial assumptions, Government funding allocations, service demand pressures, proposed budget growth, and the recommended Council Tax position for 2026/27, and requested that the Executive approved a series of recommendations for referral to Full Council at its meeting on 18 February 2026. Members noted that Government funding through the Fair Funding Allocation totalled £130.960m, an increase of £14.171m, and that the Council’s Core Spending Power was forecast to increase by £57.369m (28.3%) between 2025/26 and 2028/29. A balanced MTFP had been achieved for all four years, with a proposed Net Revenue Budget of £200.675m for 2026/27. The Mayor and Executive proposed no increase in core Council Tax but a 2% Adult Social Care precept, resulting in a Band D charge of £2,115.86. Members acknowledged the significant service demand pressures and re‑basing requirements amounting to £15.549m in 2026/27, alongside the proposal to remove £2.458m of previously approved savings that were no longer achievable. It also noted the proposals for £6.460m of service budget growth, aligned with Council Plan priorities, and £0.499m of corporate demand pressures, as well as the continuation of the Member‑Led Ward Schemes budget. Details of the proposed Capital Programme were provided, totalling £183.741m over 2026/27–2029/30, together with the 2026/27 Flexible Use of Capital Receipts Strategy amounting to £5.789m. The recommendations on reserves were noted, including maintaining the General Fund at a minimum of £11.1m and building the Financial Resilience Reserve to £10m in 2026/27, rising to £20m by 2029/30. It also considered the outcomes of the public consultation, which saw 54% support for the 2% Council Tax proposal, and received an update on the Dedicated Schools Grant, with an indicative allocation of £222.114m and a forecast cumulative deficit of £31.213m at 31 March 2026. Members proposed a series of amendments to the report which following a vote, were agreed. The budgets for the Members’ Small Scheme programme for 2025/26 and 2026/27 were reprofiled to reflect the earlier decision to allocate £150,000 for 2025/26 and £120,000 for 2026/27. It was further agreed to roll forward the £6,400 underspend from 2025/26 to 2026/27 and to bring forward £7,500 from 2027/28, resulting in a total allocation of £133,900 for 2026/27 to cover all eligible schemes proposed for that year. In relation to Pest Control, the committee agreed that the wording be amended in Appendix 3 to clarify that increased capacity would enable the Council to extend the service beyond back alleys and open spaces to domestic properties, ensuring it was clear that the expanded offer focused on key public health pests. This amendment was made to avoid the wording being interpreted as applying to offices or shops, and it was noted that a separate report would follow setting out detailed operational arrangements. Members were advised that the ... view the full minutes text for item 25/103 |
|
|
Council Tax Reduction Scheme 2026/27 Report for decision and submission to Council. Additional documents:
Decision: ORDERED that the Executive approve the proposed Council
Tax Reduction Scheme for 2026/27, as set out in the report, to be forwarded to
Council for formal approval. Minutes: The Executive Member of Finance submitted a report for
Executive consideration which set out the proposed Council Tax Reduction (CTR)
Scheme for 2026/27. Members were advised that the Council had a statutory duty
to design and locally fund a CTR scheme each year, with the final scheme
required to be approved by full Council no later than 11 March. The report outlined the minor legislative amendments to be
incorporated into the scheme for 2026/27 and explained that increases to income
bandings were proposed to ensure that levels of support for low‑income
households were maintained. Members noted how the Council had continued to develop its
income‑banded CTR scheme, first introduced in 2022/23 to simplify
administration, reduce recalculations, and improve collection rates. The scheme
provided discounts of 90%, 72%, 36% and 23%, determined by net weekly income
and household composition, and continued to support Care Leavers with up to
100% relief. The report explained that for 2024/25 and 2025/26, band ranges
were adjusted to reflect annual inflation increases to prevent reductions in entitlement.
For 2026/27, Members were informed that further increases to the income bands
were required due to above‑inflation uplifts to Universal Credit
scheduled from April 2026 to April 2029, ensuring households maintained broadly
the same level of support. It was noted that the Council’s CTR scheme supported
approximately 18,500 households, with expenditure of around £22.183 million,
and that the proposed adjustments were expected to be largely cost‑neutral,
with any minor changes in entitlement being incidental to overall scheme
expenditure. OPTIONS 1.
The Council could reduce the level of
support offered to working age residents in receipt of CTR. However, the
Council recognises the financial challenges placed on residents and is
therefore proposing that the current level of support is maintained which
incorporates the proposal to increase the income bandings in line with
inflation.
ORDERED that the Executive approve the proposed Council
Tax Reduction Scheme for 2026/27, as set out in the report, to be forwarded to
Council for formal approval. REASONS The proposed scheme would assist low-income households
and support the collection of council tax whilst remaining affordable for the
Council to provide. Council Tax Reduction (CTR) was introduced by Central
Government in April 2013 as a replacement for the Council Tax Benefit scheme,
which was administered by councils on behalf of the Department for Work and
Pensions. As part of the introduction, the Government placed the duty to create
a local scheme for working age claimants with Billing Authorities. Middlesbrough Council, as the Billing Authority, has a statutory ... view the full minutes text for item 25/104 |
|
|
Exceptional Hardship Fund - Section 13A (1) (a) Policy Report for decision. Additional documents:
Decision: ORDERED that Executive: a)
Approve the refreshed Exceptional
Hardship Fund - Section 13A (1) (a) Policy, which includes an additional
element for some Care Leavers as set out in 4.5 below; and, b)
Approve that delegated authority be
provided to the Chief Finance Officer to make minor modifications to the Policy
in consultation with the Executive Member for Finance. Minutes: The Executive Member for Finance submitted a report for Executive consideration which sought approval for adoption of the refreshed Exceptional Hardship Fund - Section 13A (1) (a) Policy under the Local Government Finance Act (LGFA) 1992 (as amended). The report explained the need to review the existing policy and outlined the introduction of an additional element to provide further support for certain Care Leavers. It was noted that a reciprocal regional agreement had been developed between the twelve North East local authorities regarding council tax liabilities for Care Leavers, and that Executive approval was required to adopt and extend the updated policy. Members noted that the previous Exceptional Hardship Fund Policy had last been amended on 26 April 2022 and was due for review during the 2025/26 financial year. Directors of Resources had supported the development of a reciprocal regional arrangement to ensure that Care Leavers under 25 did not pay council tax, and a working group had been established to finalise an agreement between the twelve North East authorities. The Council’s Council Tax Reduction Scheme already provided a 100% reduction for Care Leavers under 25, meaning the impact of the new agreement would be minimal. However, as some Care Leavers may not qualify for CTR and could still face council tax liability, the updated policy proposed the introduction of a discretionary reduction in such cases. It was noted that any financial impact of awards would be minimal and met from existing resources, and that no other changes to the policy were proposed. Members were also informed that continued government funding through the temporary Household Support Fund had enabled support to taxpayers, reducing potential Section 13A demand, but the forthcoming transition to a Crisis Resilience Fund from April 2026 might increase applications under the policy depending on future funding flexibilities. OPTIONS By extending eligibility under the policy further or
increasing the value of awards would likely come at a cost to the Council.
There was no clear evidence that would suggest a further change is necessary
which would justify further cost. Not extending the policy to provide for the situations
where the Council needs to cover the cost of Care Leaver council tax would be
administratively more involved as this would require further manual
intervention, additional cost and potentially prone to error. ORDERED that Executive: a)
Approve the refreshed Exceptional
Hardship Fund - Section 13A (1) (a) Policy, which includes an additional
element for some Care Leavers as set out in 4.5 below; and, b)
Approve that delegated authority be
provided to the Chief Finance Officer to make minor modifications to the Policy
in consultation with the Executive Member for Finance. REASONS The proposed scheme confirmed, following review, the
Council’s ongoing approach to requests for additional financial support
reducing council tax liabilities and has been extended to provide additional
support to Care Leavers in certain circumstances. The Council was required to have a policy to set out a
framework within which it would provide the additional support. |
|
|
Annual Treasury Management Strategy and Prudential Indicators 2026/27 to 2029/30 Report for decision and submission to Council. Additional documents: Decision: ORDERED that Executive approve that the following are
forwarded to Council for approval as set out below: a)
The Prudential Indicators and Limits for
2026/27 to 2029/30 relating to capital expenditure and treasury management
activity set out in tables 1 to 9 of Appendix 1; b)
The Treasury Management Strategy for
2026/27, which includes the Annual Investment Strategy for that financial year;
c)
The Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP)
Policy for the 2026/27 financial year; and, d)
An Authorised Limit for External Debt of
£354 million for the 2026/27 financial year. Minutes: The Mayor noted that the agenda title and report title were not consistent however this did not affect the content of the report. The Executive Member for Finance submitted a report for consideration by the Executive, presenting the Prudential Indicators for 2026/27 to 2029/30 and the Treasury Management Strategy for 2026/27. The report outlined the statutory requirement for the Council to set prudential indicators and approve an annual Treasury Management Strategy, which governs the Council’s borrowing, investments, and overall capital financing framework.
It was noted that the Prudential Indicators demonstrated the scale of the Council’s borrowing requirement, with the Capital Financing Requirement forecast to rise from £312.383 million in 2025/26 to £333.755 million in 2026/27, increasing further to £358.733 million by 2029/30. The report explained that the Council had total external debt of £269.360 million as at 31 December 2025, with a further £20 million of borrowing expected before the end of the financial year, resulting in an estimated year‑end total of £289.360 million. This created an under‑borrowed position of £23.023 million, financed through internal cash balances. Members were informed that capital financing costs were expected to total £14.151 million in 2026/27, representing 7.1% of the net revenue budget. Members also noted the Council’s approach to managing investment and borrowing risks, confirming that £24.917 million of cash balances were invested as of 31 December 2025, and that long‑term PWLB borrowing formed 89% of external debt. The report further detailed the requirement to set an authorised limit for external debt, which was £331 million for 2025/26, rising to £354 million for 2026/27. The Strategy also described the Council’s Minimum Revenue Provision policy, the knowledge and skills framework supporting treasury activity, and the external advice and benchmarking arrangements used to ensure the robustness, affordability and sustainability of the Council’s financial planning. OPTIONS It was a statutory requirement for the Council to approve
the annual Treasury Management Strategy and set of Prudential Indicators. This
report is a key step in achieving that objective. As a result, there are no
alternatives available. ORDERED that Executive approve that the following are
forwarded to Council for approval as set out below: a)
The Prudential Indicators and Limits for
2026/27 to 2029/30 relating to capital expenditure and treasury management
activity set out in tables 1 to 9 of Appendix 1; b)
The Treasury Management Strategy for
2026/27, which includes the Annual Investment Strategy for that financial year; c)
The Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP)
Policy for the 2026/27 financial year; and, d)
An Authorised Limit for External Debt of
£354 million for the 2026/27 financial year. REASONS The recommendations ensured that the Council are compliant with the Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities and with the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) investment guidance. They also ensured compliance with the CIPFA Treasury Management Code of Practice and the requirements of Part 1 of the Local Government Act 2003. In addition, the recommendations establish a clear financial governance framework within which officers ... view the full minutes text for item 25/106 |
|
|
Any other urgent items which in the opinion of the Chair, may be considered. Minutes: None. The decision(s) will come into force after five
working days following the day the decision(s) was/ were published unless the
decision(s) become subject to the call in procedures. |