Venue: Mandela room
Contact: Susie Blood
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for Absence Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies for Absence |
|
Declarations of Interest To receive
any declarations of interest. Minutes: There were
no declarations of interest received at this point in the meeting. |
|
Minutes- Corporate Parenting Board- 27 April 2022 PDF 839 KB Minutes: The minutes of the Corporate Parenting Board held on 27 April 2022 were read and accepted as a true record. |
|
Participation of children and young people PDF 631 KB Kathy Peacock, Youth Voice and Influencer officer and Xavier Davies, Apprentice
Youth Training & Development Officer will provide an update
to the Board. Kathy will be joined by two members of
the Children in care council. Minutes: The Chair welcomed Kathy Peacock, Voice and Influence
Manager and Xavier Davies, Apprentice Youth Training & Development
Officer to the meeting to provide an update of events undertaken by the care
experienced young people. The Chair also
welcomed Adam and Frankie, two members of the children in Care Council (CICC)
to the meeting who along with Xavier provided the Board with the update. The update
was as follows: The young
people thanked the Corporate Parenting Board for listening to them, outlining
it was nice to see decision makers take an interest in young people and make
change. The young people were also invited to attend The
Director of Education asked if there were one thing, they as care experienced
young people would like to change, what would that be? In response, Adam
expressed that he felt they were supported but to continue to listen to young
people. Frankie expressed more funding, however he was made aware this may not always
be possible. AGREED That the
update be noted. |
|
Performance against Corporate Parenting Board Strategy Paula Jemson, Head of Corporate Parenting and Performance,
Strategic s Care will present the scorecard to the Board. Minutes: The Head of Looked after Children and Corporate Parenting was
in attendance and provided the Board with information relating to the
Corporate Parenting Board scorecard. Due to the number of slides, the Head of service addressed
the key parts to Board: CP1: Number of children in care: In terms of the
Average number of weeks children spend in care, over the past 12 months, the
Council has met their target but In June it was above target, however this
depends on the children who exist care. In terms of
caseloads for social workers: This caseload
numbers has been the highest it’s been since August 2021 and several factors
impact this, for example, the recruitment of social workers. There are a number
of vacancies, however there is a workforce development strategy and a
recruitment campaign in place to address this. Nationally there are
difficulties recruiting social workers , and there is often a reliance on
agency staff. A board member enquired about the ratio of agency staff, and this
would be circulated after the meeting. This information
was important as it advised that Board that of all the children in care, 8.56%
are at home with a placement under a care order. In terms of those
in a foster placement has generally remained stable: In terms of children
placed with connected carers, less is better in this case: Following the
presentation, a Board member remarked that the numbers look good, however
questioned whether there were any social workers with caseloads more than 20.
In response, the Head of service outlined that in some instances this was the
case due to pressures within different service areas. A question
surrounding the number of social workers and terms of employment for newly
qualified / senior social workers (contract hours and time off in lieu) was
also discussed. This information was not available at the meeting, however this
would be distributed. The Director of
Education and Partnerships, further advised that the recruitment of social
workers was not unique to Middlesbrough nor was recruitment to services of
frontline staff e.g. school nursing. The
Independent review of children’s social
care by Josh MacAlister was also made reference too. The Improvement
journey was referred too, as it was encouraging to see that now children are on
their right plan of permanence. The Head of service
was thanked for her presentation. AGREED- That the information be noted |
|
Feedback from Monitoring visit- Permanence PDF 361 KB Paula Jemson, Head of Corporate Parenting and Performance,
Strategic Services will be in attendance to provide feedback from the
monitoring visit. Additional documents: Minutes: The
Head of looked after children and Corporate Parenting provided the Board with
feedback from the current ofsted monitoring visit.
On 29 and 30 March 2022, there was a 2 day monitoring
visit, this was the third Monitoring Visit since the last full inspection (plus a focused visit) There were two Inspectors, and the local
authority was given two week’s preparation. This was the first ‘face to face’
visit and areas covered were as follows: ·
Matching, placement and
decision-making for Children in Care ·
Planning and achieving permanence for
children. The
monitoring Visit feedback letter was published 6th May 2022 and a link
to the letter was included within the presentation for members. They first asked us, how well we knew
ourselves: This
was evidenced by our •
Detailed improvement plan •
Accurate Self
Assessment (SEF) and this was considered to be ‘Spot On’. We
know this through •
Our Quality Assurance processes
– It is not just about compliance •
Robust reviewing processes and
panels •
Audits – the learning loop is
crucial •
Our centre
for practice excellence was considered excellent and it is our central focus
for collating learning and improvement. In
terms of permanence, feedback was as follows: •
There was a systemic framework
for permanency planning – it’s less reactive and more forward looking. •
Stronger practice with children
who have come into care more recently and more thought about early permanence
planning •
Permanency plans now include
parallel planning to avoid drift and delay for children. •
Social workers know children
need permanence and know what they need to do to achieve it. •
Regular and high quality
supervision actively contribute to early permanence planning •
Monthly Permanence Monitoring
Group (PMG) meetings track and quality assure both plans and progression
towards permanence Positives
from the visit were as follows: •
Children in Care are visited
regularly •
Most Social Workers know their
children well and have built trusting relationships with them. •
Good direct work – calibrated
to a child’s age and understanding •
Children’s voices are informing
their planning. •
Family Time •
Children benefit from safely
assessed family time •
Family time with wider family
members is well considered •
Brother and sister ‘Together or
Apart’ assessments are completed quickly and relationships are maintained if
they can’t live together. •
Children are brought into care
in a more timely way through better court applications •
Good feedback from the local
judiciary and Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service ( CAFCASS) •
Child Permanence Reports are
sensitively written •
Social Workers understand the
need for children to have life story work so they will understand their
parentage and identity as they grow up •
Children’s records are written
directly to the child by social workers who know them •
Children will be able to see
the thought that went into the planning for their forever homes. • Care planning meetings, supervision sessions, reviews and legal gateway are well recorded ... view the full minutes text for item 22/6 |
|
Review of Sufficiency action plan PDF 341 KB Claire Walker, Specialist Commisisoning Manager will present the Sufficiency action plan to the Board. Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair
welcomed the Specialist
Commissioning & Procurement Senior Manager to the meeting to provide an
update of the highlight report of the Sufficiency action plan which was devised
out the Corporate Parenting Board Strategy. The Sufficiency
Action Plan would be reviewed and updated as actions were completed or as new
work was identified in the event of any changes to our sufficiency needs over
the 3-year cycle of our plan. The Board last received an update in March 2022. As with the
Permanency action plan, the Sufficiency action plan was broken up into 6 themed
areas, with a key accountable officer who works closely with the Manager. The themes were
as follows: Theme 1 -
Strengthening Commissioning for Children and Young People Theme 2 –
Increasing Placements Close to where Children and Young People live and learn Theme 3 – Growing
Early Intervention & Prevention Theme 4 –
Improving Placements & Support for Care Leavers Theme 5 –
Enhancing Learning Outcomes for Children & Young People Theme 6 –
Building Our Fostering Capacity and Adoption Outcomes The
Manager went through each of the priorities and identified what has been
achieved since the action plan had been last updated. Full details of these
were outlined in the report which had been circulated to the Board prior to the
meeting. The Manager
outlined the impact/ data and performance; these being: ·
Weekly
reporting on residential placement activity continues and is providing greater
level of data on placement changes and needs. ·
Recruitment
continues to be a national issue in a number of areas and work to ensure levels
of staffing both internally and externally continues. ·
Agency
staff are being utilised and internal recruitment campaigns are on-going. The
Board were made aware that in terms of going forward, a full refresh of the
Commissioning Action plan was needed and would be completed by November 2022. Following
the presentation, the Board sought clarification on the number of new providers
and it was confirmed that there were three. The third was to provide
accommodation for children with complex needs which was pleasing. In terms of
Daniel Court, there was a greater need above the capacity and the Chair queried
whether another home offering the same facilities should be opened. It was
commented that this was being discussed as part of the placement planning
meetings. A note of clarification was also sought in terms of external businesses who come to Middlesbrough to open a home and whether they work closely with the Council to offer places to Middlesbrough children. The Manager advised that a meeting with be established with any new potential suppliers , which would include a member of the commissioning team and future for families and the type of provision they plan to open would be discussed, and if appropriate we would look to put forward a business case with them, of we felt the provision would benefit some of our children’s needs. Two out of the three providers are already having in depth conversations with the local authority. ... view the full minutes text for item 22/7 |
|
Future for Families-Relational Practice Service PDF 410 KB Rob Harmer,
Service Manager, Future for Families and Julie O’Connor, Restorative Relational
Practice coordinator, Future for Families will provide a presentation on the
Relational Practice Service. Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair
welcomed by the Rob Hamer, Futures for
Families Service Manager and Julie
O’Connor Restorative Relational Practice Coordinator to the meeting, to
introduce the relational practice service, which is another arm of future for
families. It’s an adaptation from the Restorative academy, which has been created
in North Yorkshire and colleagues from North Yorkshire are being extremely
supportive to Middlesbrough during this set up. North Yorkshire have been very
successful with this approach and Middlesbrough are delighted that this will be
introduced. The Relational Practice Service (RPS) is a part of Futures for Families
and offers job opportunities for care experienced and service connected young
people aged 18 years plus, to allow them to use their past experiences to help
other young people. The Relational Practice Workers offer support and guidance to young
people who are otherwise struggling to engage with other services. The workers
form a trusted relationship with the young person, as a peer mentor, who they
can express their thoughts, wishes and feelings to. The young people go on to
achieve qualifications and job roles e.g. within North Yorkshire, a number of
young people are now working within children’s social work and another has gone
onto University. The missions and values of RPS were as follows: u To develop resilience and empathy in young people
and young adults through engaging with their personal experiences and those of
others; u To offer young people an opportunity to be
Relational Practice advocates post training to support young people in a range
of settings; u To offer continued
self-development for young people and young adults in effective communication; u To offer
training, work experience and career development opportunities to those
employed within the service; u The
Relational Practice Workers engage with young people where other agencies have
not been successful, and will act as a voice for the young person, encouraging
reflection on their own current experience How does this fit with future for families? u Relational Practice Workers will be supported by the
Restorative Relational Practice Coordinator within Futures for Families. u When employed these workers will be trained in a
variety of qualifications - Mandatory Council and restorative / Relational /
trauma informed approach u The role will deliver Restorative Relational
Practice support, complete mentoring work, and offer Asdan awards if
appropriate. u Gaining this experience will enable the Restorative
Workers to apply for vacant roles within resource and residential teams. u Currently looking at young people 18 years, however
the service may look at younger as Middlesbrough do have a number of NEETS. Interventions provided by RRP are as follows: u Conflict resolution interventions led by young
people and young adults supervised by the Relational Practice Service offering
a variety of services u Supporting young people with tenancy disputes
(supporting Housing meetings) u Group and circle work in Residential (supporting
Residential meetings) u Supporting relationship repair with those around a
young person u Supporting young people with issues of bullying u Supporting young people in Schools ... view the full minutes text for item 22/8 |
|
Any other urgent items which in the opinion of the Chair, may be considered. Any other urgent items which in the opinion of the Chair, may be considered. Minutes: No items. |