Venue: Mandela Room
Contact: Georgina Moore
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: There
were no declarations of interest received at this point in the meeting. |
|
Minutes - Planning and Development Committee - 20 January 2023 PDF 287 KB Minutes: The minutes of the meeting of the Planning and Development Committee held on 20 January 2023 were submitted and approved as a correct record. |
|
Schedule of Planning Applications to be Considered by Committee PDF 144 KB Schedule -
Page 9 Item 1 -
Nunthorpe Hall Farm - Page 11 Item 2 - Site
of former Southlands Centre - Page 49 Additional documents:
Minutes: The Head of Planning submitted plans deposited as
applications to develop land under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 22/0693/MAJ
Conversion of the existing traditional farm house and buildings to form 7 dwellings,
the demolition of agricultural buildings and the construction of 5 newbuild dwellings, along with associated works at Nunthorpe Hall Farm, Hall Farm, Old Stokesley
Road, Middlesbrough, TS7 0NP The above application had been identified as
requiring a site visit by members of the Planning and Development Committee.
Accordingly, a site visit had been held prior to the meeting. Full details of the planning application and
the plan status were outlined in the report. The report contained a detailed analysis
of the application and analysed relevant policies from the National Planning
Policy Framework and the Local Development Framework. The Head of Planning explained that the
application related to Nunthorpe Hall Farm, which
consisted of a former farmhouse and several associated agricultural
outbuildings located in Nunthorpe Village. It was
advised that the proposal was seeking planning consent for the conversion of
the existing farm buildings (former stable courtyard buildings and two grain
store buildings) into seven dwellings, the demolition of two agricultural
storage buildings, the erection of five detached dwellings with associated
garages, works to a listed walled garden to form a group of private gardens and
other ancillary works. Following consultation there had been 3
objections, a letter of concern received from nearby residents and comments
submitted by Councillor Mieka Smiles. It was explained that the objections and
concerns referenced the scale, proportion and design of the new builds; the
impact on the character of the area and setting of listed buildings; loss of
privacy; parking issues; traffic and noise increases; privacy issues from Nunthorpe Hall access rights; impacts on
nature/wildlife/biodiversity, Public Rights of Way (PROW) access issues and
broadband access. The committee was advised that the site was
outside the limits of development, as it was located within the Nunthorpe and Poole Conservation Area. Members heard that the farm buildings were
locally listed and were considered to be an important part of the village’s
character. The buildings were also considered to make a notable contribution to
the significance of the conservation area. The wall that had been constructed
to provide a walled garden was also a listed structure, being formerly
associated with Nunthorpe Hall. It was commented that
there were several other listed buildings within the immediate vicinity,
including Nunthorpe Hall. The committee was advised that the existing
farm buildings had been vacant for a considerable period and, in order to
maintain their contribution to the character of the village, their retention
and re-use was considered to be of significant importance. In 2013, the Local Authority had commissioned the North of England Civic Trust to undertake a study to examine the long-term use and retention of the heritage assets associated with the farm complex. Members heard that the study had identified that the brick-built buildings on the site would lend themselves to be converted into residential ... view the full minutes text for item 22/28 |
|
Delegated Planning Decisions PDF 120 KB Minutes: The Head of Planning submitted details of planning
applications which had been approved to date in accordance with the delegated
authority granted to him at Minute 187 (29 September 1992). A Member queried the reasons for one particular
application being a delegated decision. In response, the Head of Planning
explained that most planning applications, in accordance with the scheme of
delegation, could be assessed against the Council’s planning policies and
decided by a planning officer without needing to be considered by the Planning
and Development Committee. However, if there was a certain amount of interest
in the plans, the decision would be made by the Planning and Development
Committee, for example - when three or more objections had been received, or a
councillor had requested the application be decided by the committee, for sound
planning reasons.
|
|
Any other urgent items which in the opinion of the Chair, may be considered. Minutes: Planning
Appeals Appeal Ref: APP/W0734/W/22/3307708 16 Queens
Road, Middlesbrough TS5 6EE - Allowed The
development proposed was change of use from 3 flats to 5 bed HMO. The
main issues were the effects of the proposed development on highway safety and
on the character and appearance of the area. It
was explained that the Planning Inspectorate had acknowledged the Council’s
concern that planning permission had not previously been granted for 3 flats at
the appeal site, but the use had become lawful over time. Subsequently, the use
of the site was as 3 flats and it was within that context that the appeal had
been determined and allowed. Appeal Ref: APP/W0734/W/22/3297347 Land
at Hemlington Lane, Middlesbrough TS8 9DW - Dismissed The
development proposed was described as erection of 18no bungalows with
associated access and landscaping works. The
main issues were the effect of the development on:
It
was explained that primarily the appeal had been dismissed due to nutrient
neutrality, as the Applicant had offered up no mitigation to offset the impacts
on the SPA. NOTED Weekly Planning Lists A Member highlighted the importance of elected members receiving email
notification of the weekly planning lists. In response, the Head of Planning
advised that at the present time, due to demands and increasing workloads, the
department was unable to action the request. It was commented that Members were
able to access the weekly lists via the planning portal. It was currently taking six to eight weeks for planning applications to be
validated and assigned to planning officers. In response to Members concerns,
the Head of Planning advised that there were plans to update the system to
ensure that applications were only viewable by the public once an officer had
been allocated the case. It was advised that the Government had announced a
consultation on proposals to raise fees in line with inflation and increase
planning fees by 35% for major applications and 25% for all other applications.
Proposals also recommended the monitoring of more performance measures and
reducing the Planning Guarantee period from 26 weeks to 16 weeks for non-major
applications. NOTED |